Talk:Prospective short-circuit current
(Redirected from Talk:Prospective short circuit current)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Wbm1058 in topic Requested move 8 September 2017
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Remove "maximum"
editI think the term should be Prospective SCC leaving out the word 'maximum'. The word prospective implies the worst you can get (expected value actually), so 'maximum' is redundant. Comments?.--Light current 03:58, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, I think so. I suppose that "prospective short circuit current" is a property of the circuit, whereas "maximum PSCC" is a property of the circuit breaker, and it should be at least as high as the PSCC. To put it another way, the PSCC should not be higher than the "maximum PSCC" of the circuit breaker. I am therefore renaming the article to "Prospective short circuit current" and changing the beginning.Eric Kvaalen (talk) 17:46, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Available fault current
editI think Available fault current should redirect to Prospective short circuit current. --JohnTsams (talk) 19:02, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Requested move 8 September 2017
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. wbm1058 (talk) 20:45, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Prospective short circuit current → Prospective short-circuit current – Grammatically, I believe the hyphen to be necessary because the circuit is short, not the current. – voidxor 23:54, 8 September 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 02:32, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support this move 2601:541:4304:E6B0:218:8BFF:FE74:FE4F (talk) 22:46, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support: Clearer, easier to parse that way. MOS:HYPHEN. —BarrelProof (talk) 04:07, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.