Talk:Pseudo-runes

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Writing systems Low‑importance

	Writing portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Be careful not to confuse Ger for Ior

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Ger has two shapes: in manuscripts and on the Brandon Pin it looks like ᛄ, but elsewhere it looks like ᛡ. This has lead to a lot of confusion with people thinking instances of Ger are epigraphical instances of Ior (a rune found only in manuscript tradition). Someone had even written on this article that Ior shows up epigraphically on the Seax of Beagnoth, but it's overwhelmingly more likely that this rune is really Ger: the Seax of Beagnoth has its runes aligned alphabetically, and the rune in question holds the spot where Ger normally occupies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blodcyning (talk • contribs) 21:44, 10 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic