Talk:Hockey puck

(Redirected from Talk:Puck (sports))
Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Page move (2002)

edit
  Stale
 – Discussion no longer reflects article content. See #Page move 2 below.

Why is this page here instead of at hockey puck?

I agree, that's a better title. Moved (and links fixed).
Please sign posts. :-) — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] 10:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Word origin

edit

I feel strongly that the word puck comes from the same root as the Scottish Gaelic for shinty ball ie cnapag (knapuk), this would have been elided down into 'puck' by our French Irish and English speaking friends. Seems perfectly straight forward to me. Al Hunter

Cite sources and add it. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] 10:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ice hockey pucks frozen?

edit

Is it true that the pucks are frozen before play?64.236.170.228

Yes, they bounce too much if they aren't frozen.142.59.153.99 07:47, 6 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Page move (2007)

edit
  Resolved
 – Article moved and restructured.

This page needs to be moved to Puck (sports), rewritten slightly to discuss the general concept of a puck and what games it applies to, and then have the bulk of the rest of the article be about ice hockey pucks, since that's what we have the most material on. Right now it is confusing to readers to have links like puck in articles like Novuss. As this pucks article get broader and broader, the current name makes less and less sense. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] 10:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Rickles puck.jpg

edit
  Resolved
 – Image was deleted.

Image:Rickles puck.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:09, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Toronto puck.jpg

edit
  Resolved
 – A fair use rationale has been provided.

Image:Toronto puck.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Move back to Hockey Puck (2011)

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved Dpmuk (talk) 00:52, 14 January 2011 (UTC)Reply



Puck (sports)Hockey puck — Despite what SMcCandlish wrote above, this article is still almost exclusively about hockey pucks, and I submit that's the common name for the item (absent just "puck" which is ambiguous). If the article is ever expanded to include information about other types of pucks (though I submit they perhaps might go in their own articles), then we can discuss changing the name back. Until then, this article is clearly only about (ice/roller/water) hockey pucks. --Powers T 15:48, 6 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Support. Only one sentence is not about hockey, and is not sourced. It can be removed. Srnec (talk) 05:12, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Support. Article is clearly only about different types of hockey pucks. -DJSasso (talk) 12:58, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Support. Per nom. ʘ alaney2k ʘ (talk) 16:45, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Support' The common name.--Labattblueboy (talk) 18:46, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Delay of game paragraph

edit

I have just deleted the paragraph regarding the icing rule. It is irrelevant to this article about the puck itself. I am also going to delete the paragraph about the penalty for shooting the puck over the glass. It follows the paragraph about the death of the young girl. But that is not why the rule was introduced (4 years after the incident). So it misleads the reader into thinking there is a relationship. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 09:21, 6 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hockey puck. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:03, 29 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hockey puck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:35, 5 November 2017 (UTC)Reply