Talk:Lung compliance
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lung compliance article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
note
editCompliance is the ease with which a change occurs. For pulmonary compliance that means the relative amount of pressure needed to make a change in volume. As such emphysema may have a normal or increased compliance because the decrease in elastic tissue and alveolar tissue reduces resistance to inflation.. It would be easy to confuse the normal to increased compliance of COPD with the increased lung volume that often accompanies those conditions. High lung compliance (low effort for the amount of volume change) is generally associated with healthy lungs but as stated earlier in some conditions it can be higher than normal. --Dbrouse (talk) 21:55, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Why are the values for change in pressure backwards in the pulmonary compliance calculation?
editThe change in volume is calculated by subtracting the initial volume from the final volume, but the author uses the opposite method for calculating change in pressure. If the initial intra-pleural pressure is -5mmH2O and the final intra-pleural pressure is -10mmH2O, then the change in pressure would be "-10mmH2O-(-5mmH2O)=-5mmH2O" not "-5mmH2O-(-10mmH2O)=5mmH2O". This would mean that Compliance=0.5L/-5mmH2O=-0.1mmH2O^-1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Confusedaboutcompliance (talk • contribs) 21:55, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
^This! Why are the values backwards? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.130.116.249 (talk) 22:13, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 29 May 2017
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain t/c 17:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Pulmonary compliance → Lung compliance – Easier term more widely used -Ngrams and search Iztwoz (talk) 09:22, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support we should use common language where possible. --Tom (LT) (talk) 08:49, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
"Lung compliance"?
editThis article seems to be a mixture of lung compliance and total chest (lung and chest wall) compliance, and the two are not made clear. eg at one point it is stated that lung compliance is an important measurement in respiratory physiology. I'm sure it is important , but I suspect that it is rarely if ever measured as it needs an oesophageal balloon! Pysifr (talk) 03:41, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Compliance causes Atelectasis?
editIn addition, patients often have difficulties inhaling air as well. This is due to the fact that a highly compliant lung results in many Atelectasis which makes inflation difficult.
I don't follow. How does increased compliance result in atelectasis? Is there any merit to this statement? Datapass talk | contribs 16:09, 18 June 2021 (UTC)