Talk:Aurizon

Learn more about this page

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Trains Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	October 26, 2020

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Queensland / Transport High‑importance

Aurizon is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as High-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as High-importance).

More information:
/
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Merge with Queensland Rail

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The result of the debate was do not merge. --WikiCats 06:32, 25 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Page title

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The text in this article is correct, but the title of this page should not have a space (meaning it should be QRNational not QR National/QR_National). Because Wikipedia file names are case-sensitive, it means that the page will have to be replaced with a redirect to a spaceless-titled name. Seo75 18:56, 28 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Shifting page per proper name at QR site. --Arnzy (talk • contribs) 01:14, 29 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Aurizon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:49, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on Aurizon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:14, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Aurizon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:33, 11 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add 5040 Class?

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is 5040 just a mild upgrade of the 5020s, or a more significant difference. Either way, it should be noted for completeness.

Wikipedians may feel free to delete this section when 5040 class is addressed in the Aurizon main page.

Tuna Fish 5 (talk) 21:44, 2 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Dubious statement

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

First sentence: “and the largest of its kind in the nation.” I think that this is a little dubious, considering the fact that the “fact” comes from their own website as per the reference with nothing to back up what that actually means. Also of note, Pacific National’s website says the exact same thing about themselves. Thoughts on changing it to “one of the largest”? Fork99 (talk) 06:55, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

I've removed that questionable statement and added a similar more specific claim from third parties. - Shiftchange (talk) 05:43, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Future structure of One Rail and Aurizon articles

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please join a discussion I've initiated on the Talk:One Rail Australia page about the appropriate treatment of the One Rail article, which will have a few (fairly minor) consequences for the Aurizon article. SCHolar44 (talk) 01:19, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

For your information: new Aurizon-relevant article on Magnetic Rail Group

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dear colleagues, This is to let you know that I have prepared a new article on Magnetic Rail Group, the purchasers of Aurizon's divested assets. It replaces the interim article on "East Coast Rail", which as you may well know was the name of Aurizon's independent business unit that administered the divestiture. Discussion is here. Cheers, Simon – SCHolar44 🇦🇺 💬 at 06:19, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic