Talk:Quadruplex videotape
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on April 14, 2006, April 14, 2007, April 14, 2008, and April 14, 2012. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
2 inch Quadruplex videotape is on the "On this day" section of the Main Page on April 14. General Eisenhower 23:59, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Three Phase Supply
editI worked with the VR1000, 1200, 2000 and 2000B and none of these used three phase supply as the article claims. This was with 240v UK mains supply, so perhaps it was different for the US 120v models.
You are correct, UK units were not three phase, as they used half the amps.Telecine Guy 04:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I had a VR1000 at home in the UK in late seventies (long story). To get it working I had to buy two 1kW 240V -> 110V autotransformers but it then worked from normal domestic single-phase power . My VR1000 only had two racks of valve (tube) amplifiers, servos (KT88), PSUs etc., rather than the three mentioned in the article, and the vacuum pump and compressor were built into the console for 'mobile' use (i.e. in a van (truck)!). I got it working in 405-line then converted it to 625, but unfortunately there was a defective head tip, so every 4th band in the picture was just noise. Fom memory, the whole thing took nearly 3kW as there were a fair number of valves (tubes) in the console as well as the racks. One more memory - the 1950's instruction manual had an amusing cartoon character on the flyleaf called Mr. V.D.O. Recorder! —Preceding unsigned comment added by John Logie (talk • contribs) 10:58, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Article External Links
edit- The first two contain no content.
12.208.201.235 20:22, 23 August 2007 (UTC)Bill_S
- Fixed, thank you Telecine Guy 07:09, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
This article or section has multiple issues tag, lets talk
edit- It does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve it by citing reliable sources. Tagged since April 2008.
- Most of the references is in the External Links, these have not been make in a long time, so it cannot be referenced as nice as newer tech gear.
- Its tone or style may not be appropriate for Wikipedia. Tagged since April 2008.
- It would be nice if you gave a sample, this is old tech gear that engineers made and worked on.
Thank you Telecine Guy 07:09, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
IMPROPER SOURCING: Dates are completely wrong for the ACR-25, AVR 1, 2 AND 3.
editOk, multiple issues with the dates of many of the late 1960s and 1970s Quad decks. I'm a former Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) Broadcast engineer, and I know we bought our AVR-2s and ACR-25 machines in 1972, when the Jarvis/Mutual Street Master Control was rebuilt and computerized. The ACR-25 debuted in 1969. Not exactly sure when the AVR-2 came online, but CBC bought them in 1972. We bought lots of the crappy AVR-3s for the 1976 Montreal Olympics, as the CBC was the host broadcaster. I know we bought them in early spring 1976, so they could have been around in 1975. They were cursed, and were not in existence by the time I started working at the CBC. They were the first Quad machines to be sold off or deactivated, and were replaced by Sony BVR-2000 one-inch type C machines in the early 1980s. When I have some solid sources, I will be changing the dates (although I know what year the CBC bought their AVR-2s and ACR-25s, I'm not an official source ;-) ).--99.233.113.229 (talk) 20:59, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Quadruplex videotape. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110404045940/http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/it/1994/2/1994_2_52.shtml to http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/it/1994/2/1994_2_52.shtml
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060206115435/http://www.novia.net:80/~ereitan/rca-nbc_firsts.html to http://www.novia.net/~ereitan/rca-nbc_firsts.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Types of Color
editCheck out the following details, which are important for the history of VTR color capabilities. Because of the nature of direct composite FM recording, the first, or nearly the first Ampex monochrome VTRs could actually record color, but poorly. Of course this poor quality capability was not advertised. Those same machines could not play back in color at all.
Around 1957, RCA designed color conversions for the Ampex machines, as already mentioned in the article. Color was recorded properly with high quality, but fine detail was compromised somewhat on playback because the early color machines used the heterodyne method to stabilize the color signal. The result was very good color on the new narrow band color receivers at home, but the fine luminance detail at home was compromised. With the heterodyne method, the 1.5 MHz bandwidth of Orange (skin tone) and cyan, was effectively reduced to 0.5 MHz, which had no noticible effect on the newer TV receivers with narrow band color processing. There was an effect on the 1954 and 1955 RCA Victor color receiver models, which had wide-band color processing.
Starting in 1962, the solid state RCA machines had an analog delay line TBC for direct color recovery, not using the heterodyne method. This direct color method restored 100 percent of the luminance detail that can be transmitted over the air. Picture detail at home was visibly improved.
Also, the RCA color track TV receivers of 1985 had wide-band I/Q color processing, which benefitted in color detail from stations playing video tapes on the newer post 1961 VTRs with direct color recovery.
Ampex as well had a similar improvement, and their own direct color equipment sometime around 1962. I think it was called colortek.
Ohgddfp (talk) 16:33, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
we were set a bit of homework when I was at college by a wag of a lecturer who wanted us to think: "describe the operation of the colortec module during playback of a 625 line SECAM tape" :-) duncanrmi (talk) 01:54, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Steve Allen of Allen Electronics
editThis seems to be an error. Need some kind of reference because Mr. Allen's first name of the famous Allen Electronics was not Steve. Steve Allen was a famous entertainer and author. Ohgddfp (talk) 16:43, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Uncited material in need of citations
editI am moving the following uncited material here until it can be properly supported with inline citations of reliable, secondary sources, per WP:V, WP:NOR, WP:CS, WP:NOR, WP:IRS, WP:PSTS, et al. This diff shows where it was in the article. Nightscream (talk) 18:58, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
|
Clear numbers
editMight this go somewhere to clear up the complicated NTSC/PAL paragraph?
NTSC | PAL | ||
---|---|---|---|
B&W | Color | ||
Frames per second | 30 | 29.97 | 25 |
Fields per second | 60 | 59.94 | 50 |
Head rotations per field | 4 | 4 | 5 |
Stripes per field | 16 | 16 | 20 |
Head rotations per second | 240 | 239.76 | 250 |
Stripes per second | 960 | 959.04 | 1000 |
Head rotations per minute | 14400 | 14385.61 | 15000 |