Talk:RTL Zwei

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

RTL II also aired an anime about three mini godesses (Urd,Verdani,Skuld) and a rat,being oposed by a blond-type,equaly smal anoying female character (who'se name I do not recal).Can someone remember,what Anime it was? New Babylon

It's this series: http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/anime.php?id=266 84.169.26.206 22:51, 19 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks,but the thing is........I found out five minutes after I've posted the request.But thanks anyway. New Babylon

Fair use rationale for Image:RTL2 Break Bumper 2004.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image:RTL2 Break Bumper 2004.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 20:35, 25 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

new

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

in croatia, there's going to be a new channel, also called rtl2, so somebody can make an article about it ;)--DujeTrogir (talk) 10:30, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sense

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This statement does not make sense: «On Sunday 28 June 2009 RTL2 received its first in years to represent 15 years of RTL 2.»

Its first what? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.139.250.34 (talk) 19:30, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:23, 18 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on RTL II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:19, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

About the channel's 1993 logo

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The logo that was used at the channel's launch was later used by Cedar Rapids television station KGAN for a time between the mid-1990s and the early 2000s. However, that logo was retired in early 1996. Is there any explanation about why the channel was unable to keep that logo? J4lambert (talk) 00:43, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic