Talk:Rakul
(Redirected from Talk:Rakul (disambiguation))
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Robertsky in topic Requested move 31 March 2024
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | On 31 March 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Rakul (disambiguation) to Rakul. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 31 March 2024
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. – robertsky (talk) 14:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Rakul (disambiguation) → Rakul – No actual article with that name Jax 0677 (talk) 23:34, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The actress is the primary topic. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:59, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Why? A Google Books search for the term doesn't seem to show either of those people for me in the first dozen hits. --Joy (talk) 14:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Which means it's not evidence of anything, right? Each of those entries seems to refer to a different, non-notable person. The question is only whether the footballer, or possibly the missing see also entries Rakel Helmsdal, Rakula, Northern Territory, and Rakulik, are significant enough to approach that of the actress, and I don't see that by either usage or long-term significance since all of those are very obscure. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- But that cuts both ways - the usage and long-term significance of the name in reference to the actress seem rather less than deserving of WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT status for the given name, too. The average English reader does not associate the term "Rakul" with that person so strongly that they'd be astonished by having to pick them out of a very short list. --Joy (talk) 11:16, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Reply - The actress is not known as "Rakul". --Jax 0677 (talk) 11:47, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Which means it's not evidence of anything, right? Each of those entries seems to refer to a different, non-notable person. The question is only whether the footballer, or possibly the missing see also entries Rakel Helmsdal, Rakula, Northern Territory, and Rakulik, are significant enough to approach that of the actress, and I don't see that by either usage or long-term significance since all of those are very obscure. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Why? A Google Books search for the term doesn't seem to show either of those people for me in the first dozen hits. --Joy (talk) 14:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 12:31, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Given name alone does not seem to be commonly used to refer to either of them. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:07, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.