Talk:Untitled Rammstein album

Tracklist

Should the tracklist really remain this way? All official sources give a "censored" tracklist (which makes people guess what the tracklist is). The current tracklist is one of those guesses. I have yet to see an official channel post this. And if its official at least a source should be given.Tapio1994 (talk) 18:28, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Requested move 17 May 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 10:52, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

---

Rammstein (album) → Untitled Rammstein album – The recent title change was both unwarranted and hasty. All professionally published reviews of the album I've seen so far have noted the album as untitled ([1], [2], [3], [4]) and I anticipate more to do so. The band's own website has also noted it as untitled. It would make sense for digital platforms to consider this album to be self-titled because they can't leave the album title blank. The vinyl copy of the album doesn't have the band's name on the label (just their logo) and the CD copy doesn't have the band's name written on it either. Neither physical release has any actual text written on them, which leads me to believe that this album was intended to be untitled and not self-titled. Aria1561 (talk) 01:10, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

• Support moving the album article back to Untitled Rammstein album. Commercial sources are not an appropriate reference for the title. For primary sources, the band's website or the band's record label are acceptable. Otherwise, secondary sources, independent news sources, are the preferred source, and they are not listing the album with a name. Here is another news source with no album title (Exclaim!). Mburrell (talk) 01:58, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
• Support move - Support move to Untitled Rammstein album for reasons listed above. --Jax 0677 (talk) 12:46, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
• Support move. The reasons above are valid. IAmTheNeil (talk) 13:44, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
• Support move. All reasons above Timeless Days (talk) 15:52, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
• Support move. Originally came to argue against it, but Mburrell makes valid points. dashiellx (talk) 16:46, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
• Don't support---If an album lacks any title, isn't it standard practice to make self titled by default? Example: Metallica's 5th Album. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BluNite24 (talk • contribs) 17:22, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Metallica's 5th album does in fact have a name; Metallica. The band intended to make it eponymous (sourced claim on article). The name "Metallica" actually appears on the vinyl label and CD as well. Also, the band have retrospectively called it both Metallica and The Black Album ([5]). It also isn't standard practice to make an untitled album self-titled by default. It should be like how it is on Untitled Nas album, where the album was intended to be untitled but it is still unofficially referred to as a self-titled album, so it's at least mentioned. Aria1561 (talk) 20:31, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Follow-up: I know I am the minority, but I still contend it needs to be self titled. We have a firm answer for Metallica's 5th Album in present time, but when it first came out, the press didnt know what to call it, so many started calling it "The Black Album" or self titled. Most of the press are calling this (Rammstein's 7th) a self titled album. It also has "Rammstein" with the logo written on the side. Seems to be a de facto self titled to me. I think it should be self titled until we get further comment from the band. But again, I concede I am in the minority.— Preceding unsigned comment added by BluNite24 (talk • contribs) 02:33, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Again, Metallica intended for that album to be self-titled. That would leave me to believe that it was originally marketed as a self-titled album. It had a finite title from the get-go. Aria1561 (talk) 03:58, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

• Oppose: the comment above is correct – on Wikipedia an untitled album is named after the band. See various albums by Weezer, the first four Peter Gabriel albums, the first two Orbital albums, and Royal Trux, for example. Richard3120 (talk) 18:47, 17 May 2019 (UTC) Going to withdraw my comment, because it appears to depend on what reliable sources call the album to differentiate it. Richard3120 (talk) 18:53, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
• Support move. --► Sincerely: A¥×aᚢ ⚔ Zaÿïþzaþ€ 22:36, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

• Oppose. The album isn't called "Untitled Rammstein Album". Its name is "Rammstein". Wkipedia should not invent name for things. If the album is ramstein, it should remain this way. --Bageense^(disc.) 03:43, 20 May 2019 (UTC) I'll think a little more. --Bageense^(disc.) 03:44, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia isn't inventing any names here. There is a difference between an album being untitled and an album being titled 'Untitled'. If the album is untitled, then the article should be named "Untitled [artist] album". Yes, it's listed as Rammstein on digital platforms, but that's only because those platforms can't leave the album title blank; they put the artist's name there instead. The band intended for the album to be untitled and the physical formats of the album further indicate it as an untitled album. Aria1561 (talk) 03:46, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

album title is wrong still

on the bands website the article that originally announces the album merely titles it album 7

refer to title of article Dankmcdodginbans (talk) 08:47, 13 February 2022 (UTC)dankmcdodginbans

References