Talk:Same-sex marriage in Connecticut
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Same-sex marriage in Connecticut article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automatic Upgrades?
editIn the intro paragraph, we are told that in october 2010, "all" civil unions will be upgraded to full marriage status.
Later in the article, we are told that couples may elect to do this, voluntarily. These two are in clear disagreement, but both have sources cited? What is the correct way to reconcile these? Gushi (talk) 21:35, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- I don't know what the sources said, because they were hosted AP news that expired, but I edited the paragraph to reflect my understanding of the law based on this source from the San Francisco Examiner:
| “ | On October 1, 2010, civil unions will cease to be provided and existing civil unions will be automatically converted to marriages. Until then, existing civil unions will be kept and couples may "upgrade" to marriage voluntarily. | ” |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Same-sex marriage in Connecticut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for 365gay.com/Newscon06/07/071206conunions.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:45, 17 January 2016 (UTC)