Talk:Rediet Abebe
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
subject for deletion/puff piece
editAbebe has below 100 highly influential citations; https://www.semanticscholar.org/author/Rediet-Abebe/5651696 There are many ML professors with thousands of highly influential citations who do not have a Wikipedia article anywhere near this long. This wikipedia was created before she was a professor which rarely if ever happens. Puff piece/COI is very likely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ringdongdang (talk • contribs) 07:17, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Artificial Intelligence and Law
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 September 2023 and 12 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tuday20 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Kanmi1, Theboogeyman01, HelloIAMSME.
— Assignment last updated by 9Starbucks (talk) 01:28, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Rewrite
editI thought the article was well thought out an written. You have valid information, a neutral tone, and good citations. The only thing I could recommend changing is when her areas of research are listed out as "artificial intelligence, information, data, network, and communication science; and theory." I think this could be rewritten to be more concise Mpsheriff (talk) 19:12, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Image copyright ?
editTuday20 (@Brianda (Wiki Ed) and 9Starbucks:) you uploaded this image as being in the public domain, from her website at https://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Faculty/Homepages/rabebe.html, but then with the statement it is work by Jennifer Leahy. Could you explain? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 05:14, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
