Talk:Comparison of national standards of Chinese

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move → "Differences between national standards of Chinese". — Sebastian 02:25, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

---

Regional differences in the Chinese language → International differences in Chinese — Relisted. (notified WT:CHINA) --rgpk (comment) 22:02, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Rename. This isn't about different regions but different countries; actual separate states. The title should be edited to reflect this. Also, Chinese is generally treated as separate languages. So how about International differences in Chinese? --Munci (talk) 00:29, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

I recommend Rename to just either Differences in Chinese language or Chinese language differences, international or region both seems like weasel word. T@vatar (discuss–?) 17:00, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

I'm not sure about your reasoning of it being weasel words but anyway, "Differences in Chinese" then?, Chinese being many languages, not a single one. Munci (talk) 18:02, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

In any case, I suppose another thing to consider is that the article is treating specifically written forms of official languages and so this should reflected in the title somehow. Munci (talk) 18:04, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

If it only says Chinese, it can be interpreted as Chinese people rather than Chinese languages. T@vatar (discuss–?) 19:31, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

"Differences in the official forms of written Chinese" or something more along that lines? That way, with "written" before "Chinese", you can tell it's no talking about ethnic group. Munci (talk) 20:45, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Sorry but if Chinese is many languages, then there must be many differences within China proper (or whatever the name is for the PRC excluding Hong Kong and Macau). Right? And this article (for whatever reason) deals only with differences between China proper and its special territories and other states. Its scope doesn't fully cover the issue of Chinese differences. So certainly the present title is wrong (I expected it to be about differences between Mandarin and Cantonese or whatever), but if we want to give it another title, it can't just be "Chinese differences", there must be some qualification to show that we're talking about "international" differences (though I'm not sure that Hong Kong and Macau count as nations).--Kotniski (talk) 11:47, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

So do you think Differences in the official forms of written Chinese is better? Munci (talk) 16:46, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

• Suggestion The proposals strike me as about as bad as the current title. (Apart from Munci's last suggestion, which seems okay.) Maybe s.t. like Differences between national standards of Chinese ?

We have a few parallel articles. Two that come to mind are American and British English spelling differences and Differences between standard Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian. — kwami (talk) 07:58, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Yes, Differences between national standards of Chinese sounds good to me.--Kotniski (talk) 08:24, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

• Neither the current title nor many of the other proposals clearly or accurately represent what the article is about. (It may be nearly impossible to do so concisely.) Differences between national standards of Chinese comes closest so, support that option. — AjaxSmack 19:18, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Comparison of national standards of Chinese. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20130209133228/http://ny.worldjournal.com/printer_friendly/242505 to http://ny.worldjournal.com/printer_friendly/242505

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:20, 11 August 2017 (UTC)