Talk:Rhodesia's Unilateral Declaration of Independence/GA1
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Lemurbaby in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Lemurbaby (talk · contribs) 20:01, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Comments
edit- I believe the following images need a US copyright tag
- File:Harold Macmillan number 10 official.jpg
- File:Alexander Frederick Douglas-Home official.jpg
- File:Harold Wilson Number 10 official.jpg
- They are released by the UK government under an Open government licence, which releases the images worldwide. I think the present tags are sufficient. See here. —Cliftonian (talk) 07:42, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
- Why/how is the image File:Muzorewa 1978 b.jpg in the public domain?
- This picture, sourced here, is an image from the collection of the Dutch photographers Anefo that was released under a CC-BY-SA licence by the Dutch National Archives as part of Ga het na, a collaboration between the Archives and Spaarnestad Photo. It is tagged correctly as being under a Dutch CC-BY-SA licence. —Cliftonian (talk) 07:42, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
- There are two references with Harv format errors: refs 44 and 145
- OK, fixed—one was a misspelling of "Schwarz" as "Schwartz" and the other was a missing reference in the bibliography —Cliftonian (talk) 07:42, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
- Really well-researched, comprehensive coverage of an important event in the history of Africa. I have no critical comments on the prose - I found it easy to read and understandable even with limited prior knowledge of the topic. Thanks for your hard work on this. Lemurbaby (talk) 20:01, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the kind words and the review! I hope my answers above are adequate. Thanks again —Cliftonian (talk) 07:42, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
- Looks good - great work. I'll give this a GA pass. Lemurbaby (talk) 12:47, 21 July 2013 (UTC)