Talk:Jami (software)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jami (software) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screenshots
editScreenshots available:http://sflphone.org/screenshots — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.193.53.198 (talk)
Keep
editRing is a FOSS project for VOIP. It is notable for its long history (it has changed name from SLPhone), also it is the second best known project after Linphone, that at last entered Android platform. And it is also notable as GPL-3 licenced software. Toneymoon (talk) 09:42, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- I second that. Since the faltering of the similar Tox project, and Ring becoming a GNU Project, there has been a lot of interest in the software freedom activists, and some interest from the tech press. Some more sources:
Free Software Directory: https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Ring Linux Foundation: https://www.linux.com/learn/why-and-how-use-ring-instead-skype-linux Phoronix: https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=GNU-Ring-First-Release OpenSource.com: https://opensource.com/article/17/2/open-source-tools-on-closed-system Linux Magazine: http://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/Features/Time-to-Ring-In-Some-Changes Danylstrype (talk) 05:09, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Long Bullet List
editThe long list of bullet points towards the end of the page might be better converted into a series of paragraphs explaining the most significant features. Danylstrype (talk) 05:09, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 2 December 2020
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
put the developer as Tox, Inc. 41.144.75.170 (talk) 09:19, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
- I could not verify that. – Thjarkur (talk) 09:25, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 2 December 2020 (2)
edit| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Jami.com 41.144.75.70 (talk) 09:26, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
- Not the correct domain – Thjarkur (talk) 09:39, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Thanksgiving
editThanks so much about the notice you sent to me.I hope I will learn more . Thanks so much enjoy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kjgm (talk • contribs) 02:45, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Forgiveness.
editI just wanna say that I'm vary, vary, sorry. Was mistake that me I did on the file , and I'm vary happy for for give me notice. Thank you vary much . Have nice day.All the best... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kjgm (talk • contribs) 02:50, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 2 February 2021
edit| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
{{subst:trim 1=
}} 2600:1009:B16F:3973:324A:952A:2321:E154 (talk) 02:25, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Infobox doesn't display latest release.
editWhen displayed on my PC (Intel 64, Debian 12.7) the infobox doesn't display the latest release info. When I look at the page source, the "latest release version =" parameter is there & I can't see what's wrong with it that prevents it working. I've checked the /doc pages for both Infobox software and Multiple releases templates without luck. Please help. Kiore (talk) 23:26, 6 September 2024 (UTC)