Talk:RISE (sculpture)

(Redirected from Talk:Rise (sculpture))
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Dimensions

edit

When updating the dimensional data in the infobox, I noticed that the prose of the article, and the source of the dimensions, said that the sculpture was 30 metres wide. I get the impression, since the sculpture is apparently spherical, that it is rather 30 m in diameter. If someone can confirm this suspicion, please change the name of the width_metric parameter in the infobox to diameter_metric. If one confirms the contrary, please mention so below so that the issue can be confirmed resolved. Thanks, {{Nihiltres|talk|edits|⚡}} 22:22, 9 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rise (sculpture). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:35, 26 January 2016 (UTC)Reply