Talk:Rise of the Ogre

Release Date

Hey, isn't this book already out? I saw it in Waterstones bookshop on Monday 23 of October but it says it's out on the 26 here. Explanation anyone?

The offical time for the 'Rise of the Ogre' to come out was the 26th in the UK. I was so suprised when I got it on the 25th; that means that it came out in Amazon in the 23rd. And... I've got it, but I can't be bothered to but the whole thing on. It's too big. If somebody actually starts it, THEN I'll start typing. I'm surprised that it's not edited yet. And it was ME who put the UK version on it. What's going on, Gorillaz fans? ~ bw... blah blah blah, mwu ha ha ha haaa, waz ere, heh heh heh

Stub?

I'm pretty sure this article is a stub I mean for a 300+ page book (that's freaking huge) I just don't see how it could be shurnk into maybe a couple paragraphs. Could someone get this article assessed (I don't know how)

Casse Brown

I think we should have an article for Casse Brown, the official script writer for Gorillaz. 69.180.130.224 02:24, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Rise Of The Ogre.jpg

Image:Rise Of The Ogre.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Question:

  I have heard Rise of the Ogre is about to be revised. Can anyone clarify this please? Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.232.79.41 (talk) 01:32, 25 April 2012 (UTC) 

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Rise of the Ogre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930200126/http://us.penguingroup.com/nf/Book/BookDisplay/0%2C%2C9781594489310%2C00.html to http://us.penguingroup.com/nf/Book/BookDisplay/0%2C%2C9781594489310%2C00.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930195300/http://us.penguingroup.com/nf/Book/BookDisplay/0%2C%2C9781594482717%2C00.html to http://us.penguingroup.com/nf/Book/BookDisplay/0%2C%2C9781594482717%2C00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:56, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Title

It'd be nice to have something on what the title implies. - Joaquin89uy (talk) 16:42, 6 February 2024 (UTC)