Talk:Robert P. McCulloch/Archives/2015
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Robert P. McCulloch. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Requested move 20 December 2014
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Despite being left open for a month and a half, this discussion has effectively ended in a stalemate. No problem with another RM being started reasonably soon if attention is drawn to it (e.g. at a relevant WikiProject) to get more input. Number 57 13:31, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Robert P. McCulloch → Bob McCulloch (entrepreneur) – Or Robert P. McCulloch (entrepreneur). This person is not primary subject of the same name. Current name must redirect to Robert McCulloch. --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 04:19, 28 December 2014 (UTC) George Ho (talk) 06:17, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment the currently indicated primary topic of Bob McCulloch is this subject. -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 04:45, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- NOTE see similar move request at Talk:Robert P. McCulloch (prosecutor) -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 04:46, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose the primary topic of Bob McCulloch is the current article Robert P. McCulloch. If this is to be moved, it should move to Bob McCulloch -- 65.94.40.137 (talk) 07:51, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move 11 February 2015
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Withdrawn – My rationale was inaccurate; "Bob" not commonly used. George Ho (talk) 07:20, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Robert P. McCulloch → Bob McCulloch – If this "Bob McCulloch", the entrepreneur, is the primary subject of the same name, at least rename him to "Bob" per many sources. --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 00:09, 19 February 2015 (UTC) George Ho (talk) 19:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose move, at least for now. There currently is no mention of "Bob" name in this article, except "also known as Bob McCulloch" in lede just added by me, adding also a "citation needed" tag, much less support in the article that "Bob" is the more common name for this person. Establishing at least that first should have been done, before opening a new RM, coming close on heels of previous RM. Too much editor attention sought, when circumstances not changed.
- Note: It can be perfectly logical for Bob McCulloch to redirect to this article, and for this article to be titled "Robert P. McCulloch". (Readers searching on "Bob" could most often be looking for this one AND "Robert P." can still be the most common name for this one, searched for more than "Bob".) --doncram 04:21, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.