Talk:Robert Peverell Hichens/GA1
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Jim Sweeney in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Magic♪piano 14:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Some images have confusing rights on their description page. If the images are out of copyright, remove the non-free image rationale.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Overall a nice read. You need to work on your grammar a bit -- I fixed a number of run-on sentences and other grammatical irregularities. I've noted above that a few of the images have descriptions saying they are PD, but also contain a non-free image rationale. This is something that ought to be fixed (also, you should probably use the {{Information}} template to capture the origin of the picture), but I don't think it's something to hold up passing the GA. Congratulations! Magic♪piano 15:49, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks changed the images to the inf template. --Jim Sweeney (talk) 13:33, 5 January 2010 (UTC)