Talk:Robert Skidelsky

Untitled

bilderberg? why is there no mention

Also, what's the proper way (if any) to include his net worth? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Knile (talk • contribs) 18:55, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Add review?

• Two new books probe the limits of capitalism July 21st 2012 The Economist

99.112.212.152 (talk) 07:32, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Edward and Robert

What is the relationship between Edward Skidelsky and Robert (namely Lord) Skidelsky?

Apparently they co-write many papers and books. But are they relatives? WOuld be interesting to clarify this point in the article.Stanjourdan (talk) 12:51, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Robert Skidelsky, Baron Skidelsky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110117034131/http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/alumni/news/events/skidelsky/ to http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/alumni/news/events/skidelsky/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:57, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Is he allowed to edit his own page?

https://twitter.com/RSkidelsky/status/1516149935644807182 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1970:4B9C:BC00:11B3:8F22:9EB7:3A92 (talk) 20:40, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

• To give this some context: Numerous edits by Nangaf (talk · contribs), starting here, as well as the (unverified) Twitter account claiming to be Skidelsky's (preceding the tweet linked above), claim that he is no longer on the board of Russneft as of December 2021. This is supported by citing the House of Lords register of members' interests which says the interest ended on 1 January 2022. The tweet linked above mentions that this article "has not been updated" and announces an intention to "do this immediately" (presumably meaning "update it"). (Russneft's own website still lists him as a board member, though perhaps this too hasn't been updated – its copyright notice ends in 2017(!).) @Nangaf: would you care to comment on this situation? If you are Robert Skidelsky or editing on his behalf, please familiarise yourself with Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and disclose this fact in the interests of the encyclopedia's integrity. Hairy Dude (talk) 00:29, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

I'm not, but I did see the Twitter thread. Nangaf (talk) 02:12, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

I just reverted an abusive edit. There may be a case for a short period of protection for this page while the Twitter controversy is ongoing. Nangaf (talk) 02:22, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

I'm not sure any protection is justified as there seems to be no edit warring going on here. But it might be helpful to establish whether or not Mr Skidelsky is permitted to edit this article, as it's pretty obvious that's what he intended to do yesterday. I think his position with regard to Russneft is now perfectly clear. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:02, 19 April 2022 (UTC)