 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Roger Sandall be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 07:41, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Neoconservative?
editAs there are similarities between his viewpoints and those of neocons, I wonder if he shouldn't be described as a neocon. Then the attitudes he calls "designer tribalism", I would simply call multiculturalism.
- If there were only similarities, then the answer is no. After all, one can find similarities between certain views of Bill Clinton and Bill Kristol, or (to use a more striking example) Pat Buchanan and Norman Podhoretz, but that doesn't make either Bill Clinton or Buchanan neocons. Not to mention Sandall wasn't actually American, which further complicates the matter. --Ismail (talk) 21:32, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Bibliography
editI have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section:
- Cite templates will be used where possible.
- I prefer capitalization and punctuation to follow the standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, rather than "title case".
- Links (either direct or indirect) to potentially unreliable or incomplete digitised copies and to booksellers may be removed.
This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 10:19, 20 October 2024 (UTC)