Talk:Rohilkhand

Rohilkhand couldnot be muslim state originally

The word "Rohilkhand" is made up of two words; "Rohil" and "Khand". Rohil of course stands for Rohilla and "Khand" is a pure sanskrit word which means "part". If Rohilkhand had been established by muslim rohillas,the name would have been something like "Rohillabad" or "Rohillapur".

             The place was established by Hindu Rohillas,who later embraced Islam enmass. So you don't find a trace of the hindu roots of the kingdom/region. There are some Hindu Rohillas still  living in Uttar Pradesh, Haryana and Rajasthan. They are a lost identity.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rohilla (talk • contribs) 06:56, 16 October 2008 (UTC) 

Inflammatory Comments

The following two sentences seem biased and unobjective:

The Whig historians have depicted the Rohillas as little, if at all, lower than the angels. They were really a set of faithless and blood-thirsty mountaineers, who had made themselves especially hateful to the Hindus by their plunder of the holy places at Allahabad and Benares[citation needed].

The sense of the first sentence is true. Whigs prosecuted Warren Hastings in part for the destruction of the Rohilla tribe and the plunder of their cities, and presenting the attacks on the Rohilla as unprovoked aided that prosecution. The phrase, "little, if at all, lower than the angels" is in the flowery prose of the 19th century, and likely came either from a Whig publication or a contemporary rebuttal. If so, it should be enclosed in quotation marks and sourced. If not, more objective language should be used.

The first clause of the second sentence, especially the depiction as "faithless and blood-thirsty mountaineers" is both derogatory and inflammatory, and is doubtful from a historical perspective. (The Rohilla were Muslims, even if not unusually devout.) It may have also come from a 19th century source biased against the Whigs, and should either be sourced or deleted.

The second clause of that sentence, describing attacks against Allahabad and Benares could be true, although I agree that a citation is needed. I have been able to find evidence of Maratha (enemies of the Rohilla) attacks against these places, but not Rohilla attacks. Perhaps someone more acquainted with this history might be able to find the evidence that I have not.

Also, the sentence further down describing Ali Mahomed also seems biased:

Shah Alam's grandson, Ali Mahomed, a man of resource and courage and quite devoid of scruple, was eventually appointed governor of Sirhind.

The source is possibly made more clear by the following sentence:

Taking advantage of the invasion of Ahmad Shah Abdali, he added in 1748 to the lands already acquired by him those formerly owned by officers absent on field service.

Ahmad Shah Abadali was the founder of the Durrani Empire and natural foe of the Maratha. Taken altogether, the depiction of Ali Mahomed appears biased in favor of Maratha predudices. The last sentence of the paragraph is attributed to Kincaid's History of the Marathas, so that seems plausible. Perhaps the entire last paragraph should be treated as a quotation and sourced to Kincaid's book?--Eljefe3126 (talk) 22:10, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://sites.google.com/a/vkhan.com/www/rohilla.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. TreyGeek (talk) 21:08, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Rohilkhand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071030042415/http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Rohilla to http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Rohilla
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110613024309/http://www.isamasih-lucknow.org/3.html to http://www.isamasih-lucknow.org/3.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:15, 20 December 2017 (UTC)