Talk:Royston Smith
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Royston Smith be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Requested move 24 May 2018
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: MOVED (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:40, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Royston Smith (politician) → Royston Smith – 27,704 views vs. 453 views.[1] Unreal7 (talk) 21:16, 24 May 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. Dekimasuよ! 05:17, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose. Political figure with with no international or, apparently, domestic renown. Not WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:26, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support The oppose !vote misunderstands the meaning of primary topic. A page must not reach some arbitrary threshold of renown to be the primary. It's about relativity to other pages with the same name. In this case, all signs show a very obvious primary. A hatnote will resolve the TWODABS situation.--Yaksar (let's chat) 22:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support. An overwhelming WP:primary topic. There's no point in having a dab page in a WP:TWODABS situation like this. Station1 (talk) 21:45, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Verifiability and neutrality
editThe statements that have been reintroduced in Special:Diff/915192762/915395874 do not seem to be written in a neutral tone to me; I'd like to see an inline citation that directly supports these additions (WP:BURDEN). ~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:37, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
The neutral tone of this statement is supported on page 8 of the inline citation - 'MPS Outside Interests': "A majority of MPs do not hold remunerated outside interests". [1] The additions are further supported by the inline citation of UK Parliaments' Register of Financial Interests. ~ Zemedia (talk) 16:37, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:23, 8 June 2020 (UTC)