Talk:Rudolf Spanner
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
This article really needs more biographical information about Spanner. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tchernobog (talk • contribs) 05:39, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
WHY DON'T YOU MENTION PROFESSOR SPANNER'S NATIONALITY?
editWhy is Spanner's nationality skipped in the article? Didn't he have any? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.127.96.85 (talk) 00:43, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
whats in soap?
editeveryone has their own story about soap and whats in soap.somepeople needs to know the real story about soap.can someone email me some true facts at l.i.lwest38@gmail.com
thank you
whats in soap?
editeveryone has their own story about soap and whats in soap.somepeople needs to know the real story about soap.can someone email me some true facts at l.i.lwest38@gmail.com
whats in soap?
editeveryone has their own story about soap and whats in soap.somepeople needs to know the real story about soap.can someone email me some true facts at l.i.lwest38@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keon jackson (talk • contribs) 07:36, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Two one-sided descriptions
editThe Polish version of the article cites the results of the investigation by INR as a confirmation that human soap was produced (albeit in small quantities), this version focuses on the alternative theory. Both articles could complement one another. Also, the fact that Spanner was a Nobel-worthy physician is a bad argument against his involvement in scientifically worthless experiments. It wouldn't be the first "great man" to feel they can do as they please with impunity. 89.64.14.110 (talk) 22:27, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
- He was not involved in any experiments at all though. Thats the point. That some "soap-experimentation" took place is literally made up. He was just a normal teacher/professor accused to give the "concentration camp soap" myth (which was totally unrelated to Danzig Institute/Spanner) some legs to stand on when it became apparent that it was not true. --Havsjö (talk) 14:53, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
- The very same article you are spamming the articles with by "freelance historian" admits that Spanner confessed to making soap out of human corpses.
--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 23:26, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
- That human soap is not part of the Holocaust. Nothing criminal is related to Spanners "human soap", which is why he was declared innocent of all accusations and is considered as such by the Polish state --Havsjö (talk) 16:44, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Nothing criminal is related to Spanners "human soap", which is why he was declared innocent of all accusations and is considered as such by the Polish state Absolutely false:[1] In Kulesza's opinion, Spanner's activities constitute "one of the darkest pages in the Second World War." He emphasized, however, that—were Spanner alive—it would not be possible to bring charges against him for Nazi crimes, but only, at most, for removing evidence of such crimes by destroying corpses. --MyMoloboaccount (talk) 18:19, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
So when it comes to Spanner’s activities, the authorities have just washed their hands? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.4.136.172 (talk) 07:18, 7 November 2021 (UTC)