Talk:Russian ironclad Sevastopol/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dank (talk · contribs) 00:31, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Review

• The toolbox checks out.
• "an 32-gun": a 32-gun
• "; four on the upper deck as chase guns and 28 on the lower deck.": sentence fragment; change the semicolon to a comma
• "two gun": two guns
• "her armament was changed again and now consisted of fourteen": "... changed again, to fourteen".
  • I didn't like the comma after again and went with: "In 1877, her armament was changed again to 14 eight-inch guns".
• "that reduced": "reduced" isn't impossible in this sense, but it's a little uncomfortable. How about "that narrowed"?
• "All dates used in this article are Old Style": period needed.
• "Robert Gardiner": "Gardiner, Robert"
• Otherwise:

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   - Dank (push to talk) 00:47, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

All done, thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:43, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Passed. - Dank (push to talk) 20:47, 29 June 2013 (UTC)