Talk:SPARCstation LX

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

don't merge IPX and LX.

IPX is a sun4c and has radically different design, IOMMU contexts and sbus setup. Incompatible processors with the LX which is sun4m.

Seriously.. very very different machines. Well.. maybe not if you say "they are all in a small square box of similar dimensions" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.168.106.176 (talk) 07:43, 22 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, if anything were to be merged, it definitely wouldn't be with 4c/IPX/etc. Since there isn't any discussion here, I'm going to remove the "merge" suggestion on the article. The Deviant (talk) 16:31, 3 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ha, I just realized, someone basically cut/pasted the SPARCclassic page into this one. I propose merging LX into the classic page, as they are virtually identical (differences can be explained in a paragraph - OH WAIT, they already are. I think this article could be deleted and linked to SPARCclassic.The Deviant (talk) 16:41, 3 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

merge

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Should all the sun4c machines be in one article (with redirects), and all sun4m in another? Then there is sun4 (original), and sun4u. But yes, as I understand it, LX and classic are very similar. Gah4 (talk) 19:39, 10 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic