Talk:SSX (2012 video game)

Reception

A Reception section - already? I realise reception to the serious tone of the trailer has been poor amongst the general public, but there's only one brief comment on the tone from a reliable third-party source about it, so I don't think it is reasonable to put a reception section so early. SynergyBlades (talk) 14:49, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

This is fine, it doesn't constitute a full section just yet, but the general reception should definitely be included somewhere as long as it's from reliable sources. 82.41.203.134 (talk) 15:06, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

...which is exactly the opposite of the section at hand — plus the hostility has attracted vandals. I reverted the vandalism and added an unreferenced box; hopefully someone who is above the controversy can actually cite references. - PGSONIC (talk) 19:45, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Introduction

Needs to be fixed (what happened there?!) and revised. The two "Making of" videos suggest the opposite of people's initial impressions; the over-the-top fantasy vibe from the previous games appears very much intact. The videos show concept art of fantasy mountain locations and trick animations which are wholely impossible to perform in real life.

Part one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2GAnU5IucE

Part two: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXSInhab5Ns —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.209.179.203 (talk) 23:47, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Upcoming title

Isn't it now called "SSX : Deadly Descents"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.142.252.114 (talk) 20:01, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

The game was originally titled SSX: Deadly Descents, but it has since been changed to simply SSX. Fezmar9 (talk) 20:14, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on SSX (2012 video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110710173434/http://www.egmnow.com/egmi/issue/243-4.html?page=15 to http://www.egmnow.com/egmi/issue/243-4.html?page=15

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:08, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Re: the statement "The main bulk of the game is the World Tour mode". This simply isn't so. World Tour is actually a minor part of the game, consisting of only a selected few of the tracks and taking very little time to complete. Explore & Online modes are by far the biggest part of the game.

Incorrect statement

Re: the statement "The main bulk of the game is the World Tour mode". This simply isn't so. World Tour is actually a minor part of the game, consisting of only a selected few of the tracks and taking very little time to complete. Explore & Online modes are by far the biggest part of the game. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:3D84:D900:D462:D783:22B5:57FC (talk) 13:14, 29 July 2018 (UTC)