Talk:SS Yarmouth Castle

Fair use rationale for Image:Yarmouth afire.JPG

Image:Yarmouth afire.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Link to USCG report

The link to the USCG report for the entry on Yarmouth Castle fire takes one to the current USCG page, which has no listing of the report. Correct link: http://www.uscg.mil/hq/cg5/docs/boards/yarmouthcastle.pdf Is listed under the Dept of the Treasury. Hope this helps. Great entry. --Badboy64 (talk) 02:21, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Unsubstantiated claims in article

The description of the fire in this article is not substantiated in the USCG report on the fire, nor does the article contain references to back its version of events. The article really should be rewritten using the USCG report and other materials to provide a more factual, less sensationalized account of the fire as described in the report --mcpusc (talk) 00:57, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

I'm starting to rework the article on the fire. I hopefully should have something supported by the USCG report later this week. --mcpusc (talk) 00:57, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Wow. I've finally updated this, seems that nobody got round to it in the last 10 years or so... I've seen a documentary about this, which might be behind a lot of the things that were originally in this article. Unfortunately I couldn't source that documentary properly - while it was skewed in certain regards, there were also eyewitness accounts in there that could be used.

Much of what was in the article wasn't properly sourced or even contradicted the official report (e.g. article: "sprinkler did not activate" - report: "sprinkler did activate", article: "acts of cowardice and heroism" - report: "crew that remained [...] performed adequately", ...)

My work could probably use some copyediting, but the facts are from the official report now. --Averell (talk) 10:19, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Sister ship the real Yarmouth Castle

Her sister ship SS Yarmouth was actually launched in 1926, not 1927. In 1954 it was sold for service as cruise ship under the Panamanian flag with Eastern Shipping Corporation of Miami. Yarmouth was renamed Yarmouth Castle. Renamed Queen of Nassau for a contract with the government of the Bahamas. In 1956 Eastern renamed her Yarmouth Castle again. She was again given her original name of Yarmouth in 1961 for some cruises from Boston to Yarmouth. The Yarmouth was laid up 1966. Note: her sister ship SS Evangeline (1927) was named Yarmouth Castle in 1961 and sank in 1965. None of this is explained here... Broichmore (talk) 20:28, 13 June 2018 (UTC)