Talk:Sabre (travel reservation system)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 18 June 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Sabre (computer system) to Sabre (travel reservation system). The result of the discussion was moved. |
A TPF application?
editSabre was built on top of TPF, right?
If so, we should probably mention this.
Atlant 21:50, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Some current version of it could conceivably be, but the original predates System 360, of which TPF is apparently a descendant. I believe the original was largely (or exclusively) written in assembler, and in that era probably directly on the metal with no OS as such. PeteVerdon 16:02, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, PeteVerdon!
Before TPF it was ACP (Airline Control Program), jointly developed by American Airlines and IBM. TulsaTV 04:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
And what about EDS? there is nothing here at all —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.193.213.26 (talk) 16:29, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Location of original SABRE systems
editI have it on very good authority that the twin 7090s were located in Briarcliff Manor, about 2 miles from here. ;-) I have marked the building, which still stands, in Wikimapia. Search for SABRE. Capek 21:59, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
SABRE Acronym
editI lot of old timers here at AA seem to remember the acronym being short for Semi-Automated Business Reservation Environment, not Research Environment. While it was based on SAGE (Semi-Automated Ground Environment), the purpose of SABRE was reserving seats not researching them. I'll drop by the c r smith museum and verify. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.9.56.131 (talk) 21:55, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Sabre Logo 1.PNG
editImage:Sabre Logo 1.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Relative Dollar Value in History Section
editA paragraph in the History Section states:
"A formal development arrangement was signed in 1957, and the first experimental system went online in 1960, based on two IBM 7090 mainframes in a new data center located in Briarcliff Manor, New York. The system was a success. Up until this point it had cost the astonishing sum of $40 million to develop and install (about $350 million in 2000 dollars). ...."
I'm wondering if the $350 million adjusted dollar value is correct. Using the calculator at http://www.measuringworth.com/uscompare/, I get:
In 2000, $40,000,000.00 from 1960 is worth:
- $233,000,000.00 using the Consumer Price Index
- $191,000,000.00 using the GDP deflator
- $270,000,000.00 using the value of consumer bundle
- $275,000,000.00 using the unskilled wage
- $484,000,000.00 using the nominal GDP per capita
- $756,000,000.00 using the relative share of GDP
Relative monetary value is a complicated issue, of course, but I would think that most Wiki readers would want a value either more consumer oriented (the first four estimtes) -- a value that relates to their daily lives, that is, their own purchasing power -- or more large-scale spending oriented (the last two estimates) -- a value that relates to big corporate / government purchasing power.
Having a value in the middle of the two groups ($350M) seems to me quite confusing. Morsedl (talk) 03:23, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Direct Connect
editThe last paragraph states "Sabre, Expedia, Orbitz and some consumer advocates think that American's tactics with Direct Connect are aimed at making fare comparisons harder... " There is no other mention of "Direct Connect" in this article. What is it and what claims are the critics making?
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Sabre (computer system). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070406033413/http://www.dot.gov:80/affairs/CRSrule.htm to http://www.dot.gov/affairs/CRSrule.htm
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060702174342/http://www.travelweekly.com:80/specialreports/GDSrule.pdf to http://www.travelweekly.com/specialreports/GDSrule.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:20, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Sabre (computer system). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dot.gov/affairs/CRSrule.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.travelweekly.com/specialreports/GDSrule.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041204030934/http://www.blackbeard.com/tpf/tpfhist.htm to http://www.blackbeard.com/tpf/tpfhist.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:10, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Timeout
editA review of 3+ years prior to the "close connection" HatNote shows that the major wordings were already there. 5+ years of trimmings have removed the WP:ADVERT situation. The "connection" review includes having looked at the article's history dating back to 2004. The single edit by the identified "Connected contributor|Skip9375" was also WP:ADVERT-like (and has been removed) Pi314m (talk) 22:18, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Travicom/Boadicea?
editI heard somewhere that one of the predecessors to British Airways, BOAC (British Overseas Airways Corporation), developed a early computerised reservation system, called Boadicea (running on British built computer hardware). This included a transaction processing monitor capability which was later generalised and adopted for a few other uses (certainly military supply chain), and non-airline uses of the TPM software lasted well into the 1990's (with the software running using several layers of hardware emulation to allow operations on more up to date hardware).
Boadicea was presumably replaced by Travicom.
Boadicea would have been developed about the same time as Sabre, certainly within a few years (unlikely to pre-date Sabre but that assertion should be verified by research)
There are some references to Boadicea visible via internet search, but will need some effort to develop into a proper article to permit a "See Also" link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.72.50.58 (talk) 00:39, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Requested move 18 June 2022
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Consensus that the proposed name better reflects what Sabre is. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 07:11, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Sabre (computer system) → Sabre (travel reservation system) – or Sabre (travel booking system). This is not about a particular computer or type of computer. It is about a travel reservation system that consists of many computers, communication links, various software programs, a database, etc. — BarrelProof (talk) 21:02, 18 June 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. >>> Extorc.talk 04:21, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- As a professional travel agent, I would agree that this is a TRAVEL RESERVATION SYSTEM which links airline/car/hotel/rail companies' reservations systems under a single distribution network. It is more of a 'system' than a 'computer' as previously noted. 8.22.67.7 (talk) 16:06, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support. I work in travel, and use this system. It's more than a computer system, which can mean a multitude of things. Sabre is a travel reservation system and this should be in the name.--Dmol (talk) 21:08, 20 June 2022 (UTC)