Talk:Salesian College, Battersea

famous pupils

alfred hitchcock danny thompson —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.198.120.237 (talk) 02:24, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Re Ofsted Inspections Not sure why we need a link to Ofsted Inspections since nothing of any great importance has been said of the school by Ofsted since 2001. The section is therefore just filling space (and rarely features on any school's page unless Ofsted have said something of great importance).Timzim99 (talk) 21:30, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Too many 'notable former pupils' are unreferenced and should therefore be deleted. Tomintoul (talk) 18:04, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Unreferenced 'notable' former pupils deleted. Do not add back unless linked to their Wiki page or otherwise referenced.Tomintoul (talk) 15:03, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Tom Champagne

Tom Champagne. Somebody is repeatedly adding this unreferenced redlink person back. He does not meet notability criteria, so could they please explain why.Tomintoul (talk) 16:09, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Re Article Salesian College (London), I am the one who added the name of Tom Champagne to the list of notable alumni. I was at school with him back in the 1950s/60s and can vouch for his notability - not least on the grounds stipulated: namely, that he was the signatory of a junk mailing - ahem, circular letter - inviting people to participate in the Reader's Digest lottery. He retired from this post a few years ago, but not before he had imposed his name on large sectors of the public consciousness. Are you a Battersea Old Boy yourself, might I enquire? If so, do you consider that makes you arbiter of 'notable' v 'non-notable'? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.179.252.175 (talk) 15:09, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Wiki has strict notability criteria and and you have not demonstrated he is/was notable. Normally a notable person will have their own Wiki article. At the very least he should be referenced against an independent reliable source.Tomintoul (talk) 23:26, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Removal of Brian Curtin

What could be mischievous about including Curtin? Surely an example Bosco and Savio would have savoured.Dekethorton (talk) 19:22, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

I think you're confusing the words "notable" and "notorious". Timzim99 (talk) 20:57, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Curtin would appear to meet notability criteria and can therefore be included.Tomintoul (talk) 15:48, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

To that end, I am restoring the link, which had mysteriously disappeared. Wikipedia articles are not school prospectuses.87.84.11.82 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:19, 7 April 2012 (UTC).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Salesian College, Battersea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080723183159/http://www.salesians.org.uk/dbuk/history1.html to http://www.salesians.org.uk/dbuk/history1.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131017090553/http://www.sjbc.wandsworth.sch.uk:80/index.php/sjbc-developments/ to http://www.sjbc.wandsworth.sch.uk/index.php/sjbc-developments/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100830125329/http://www.therealdannythompson.co.uk:80/Biography.html to http://www.therealdannythompson.co.uk/Biography.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:44, 14 January 2016 (UTC)