Talk:Salyut programme
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Salyut programme article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Salyut programme: 1) Section on program background:
2) Vast expansion of individual station sections.
3) Section regarding support craft:
4) Section on program's legacy.
Priority 1 /Need references
|
History
editThere should be some background to the article. Korolev had aspirations for a Space Station and the Soviets had planned to use the N1 to launch a large structure going back to 65. The rush to put up Salyut was a result of the N1 failures.
Article title capitalization
editI suspect the WP:MOS would have us title this article Salyut program, reversing the sense of the current redirect. Should we comply? (sdsds - talk) 20:12, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
NASA diagram
editThe article has a NASA diagram entitled "Development of the Soviet/Russian space stations and derivatives", this chap here. I can understand why it exists, and why it is relevant, but it is hard to comprehend, it provides too much detail, and the lengthy caption makes it seem even more complicated; furthermore, the caption makes the diagram take up a lot of space on the page, but the diagram makes no sense without the caption, which cannot easily be condensed. I would suggest removing the diagram from here and putting it in a generic article about the Soviet manned space programme. I would do this myself, but clearly someone has gone to the trouble of uploading it, and perhaps they can make sense of it after all. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 16:40, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- That diagram is just for the Salyut program, so it's appropriately used here.. but I agree it's confusing. Basically it's a timeline contrasting the two types of "Salyut" spacecraft: the civilian (on top) and the military (on the bottom). I agree, it could be improved and simplified. Mlm42 (talk) 03:24, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
NR 30mm
editThe statement concerning the gun is not confirmed by the sources. The quote thers is that "several sources confirm that after the last crew left the test cannon was fired to depletion via remote control". Not more, not less. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.27.9.213 (talk) 13:02, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Correcting an error in an image file name
editThe name of the file, File:Model of Salyut-7 with two Soyuz spacecrafts.JPEG contains an unusual plural form of spacecraft. Spacecrafts is not usually used unless one refers to skills used for spaceflight. The file is linked to only four pages including this article. The name could be changed for the file and each of the four links. Moving a file to a different name is something I have never done. - Fartherred (talk) 00:35, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Page move
editI don't want to start a British versus American English debate here, but woudn't it be better to move this page to Salyut program? There is Soviet space program, Chinese space program etc--Arado (talk) 10:03, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
enIPA?
editExternal links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Salyut programme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150930134912/http://www.wired.com/2012/03/skylab-salyut-space-laboratory-1972/ to http://www.wired.com/2012/03/skylab-salyut-space-laboratory-1972/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:43, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Salyut programme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5il9QixAg?url=http://ston.jsc.nasa.gov/collections/TRS/_techrep/RP1357.pdf to http://ston.jsc.nasa.gov/collections/TRS/_techrep/RP1357.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://ston.jsc.nasa.gov/collections/TRS/_techrep/RP1357.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:13, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Program vs programme inconsistency
editThe text of the article uses both arbitrarily interchangeably.--Adûnâi (talk) 00:11, 4 December 2018 (UTC)