Talk:Same-sex union legislation
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Same-sex union legislation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
Turkey
editIn the process of rewriting the Turkish constitution, the opposition party BDP, called for the liberalization of the marriage policies, which would include same sex marriage. The biggest opposition party in the Turkish parliament,CHP, supported the idea. The largest party in the parliament, the AKP, is against same sex marriage, all tough Premier Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, the leader of the AKP, supported full equal rights for LGBT citizens in 2002. Same sex marriage will soon be discussed again by members of the parliament, since all political parties gather in committees to establish a new constitution.[1] [2] [3] [4]
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Veritas-tr (talk • contribs) 22:43, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Colima ? Civil Union in mexico
editDurango, Mexico
editDurango repealed a proposal of same sex marriage by 26 to 3 votes http://www.sdpnoticias.com/gay/2014/04/11/no-acepto-dicen-legisladores-de-durango-al-matrimonio-gay ==
Poland
editPoland rejected Civil Union bill (185-235)
Removing the Too Long tag
editThe goal of this post is to establish a way to get rid of this tag (it is ugly and ironically makes the problem worse). I see a couple of options.
1) Just remove it, there is no longer a length problem.
2) Split the article. The sections I think that are possible to split off are the sub-national legislative efforts or the Prohibition of same-sex unions. 2A02:1810:BCA9:3A00:C893:D665:85F2:B966 (talk) 09:34, 8 June 2023 (UTC)