Talk:Santa Monica Air Line

Trains: By country series Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the By country series task force.

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

References, please.

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can we get some citations? Much of this looks like it has been written by a person who eyeballed parts of the line when it was quiescent. That's fine, but we need more than just somebody's observations. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 03:23, 8 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Electrification

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

A recent edit by @Mjdestroyerofworlds indicates electric service began in 1908, however the 1905 dated photo clearly shows overhead catenary. Not sure if the photo or reference is incorrect, but heads up that a little digging may be needed. ˜˜˜˜ Lexlex (talk) 02:28, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

the Flickr source for this photo says circa 1911. It may have been changed since the image was copied over to wikimedia, but 1911 sure makes a bit more sense. Link to Flickr -MJ (talk) 02:45, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic