Talk:Santiago Bernabéu (footballer)

No Mention of Facist and Nazi Connections?

Bernabeu was a well known supporter of Franco, who in turn was a supporter of the Nazis. There are many images of RM players giving Nazi salutes during matches. His Nazi connections should be mentioned in this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.230.191.246 (talk) 22:06, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Santiago Bernabéu Yeste. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090719091738/http://www.realmadrid.com:80/cs/Satellite/en/1193041516821/1193040973708/contenido/Presidente/Santiago_Bernabeu.htm to http://www.realmadrid.com/cs/Satellite/en/1193041516821/1193040973708/contenido/Presidente/Santiago_Bernabeu.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:51, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 22 June 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus. This time see no general agreement below to rename these pages. As is usual with a no-consensus outcome, editors can strengthen their arguments and try again in a few months to garner consensus for these page moves. Kudos to editors for your input, and Happy Publishing! (nac by page mover) P. I. Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there 22:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

---

• Santiago Bernabéu Yeste → Santiago Bernabéu
• Santiago Bernabéu → Santiago Bernabéu (disambiguation)

– The WP:COMMONNAME of this person is just Santiago Bernabéu, and all external links, and references follow that (a couple of the links on his page are dead). Tons more web results using his shortened name withtout his second last name. Additionally, all of the other pages listed on the current Santiago Bernabéu page link back to this particular individual as well, and omit his second last name. Santiago Bernabéu Stadium is a more popular page, but is named after this individual. Ortizesp (talk) 21:15, 22 June 2019 (UTC) --Relisted. Paine Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there  22:54, 5 August 2019 (UTC) --Relisted. Paine Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there  03:32, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Previous closure - reopened
Moved. See general agreement below to grant this request. Kudos to editors for your input, and Happy Publishing! (nac by page mover) Paine Ellsworth, ed. put'r there  02:03, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 08:15, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Relister's note: members of WikiProjects Biography/Sports and games and Spain have been notified of this discussion. Paine Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there  10:33, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

• Support per nom, clear PRIMARYTOPIC. GiantSnowman 08:21, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
• Support I think that this is a great idea. Nobody really refers to Santiago Bernabéu as Santiago Bernabéu Yeste. KingSkyLord (talk) 14:28, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
• Oppose. Generally, people get their own names even if there are things named after them (e.g. New Yorkers will frequently refer to the airport as just "JFK"), but here the stadium is so much more well-known than the individual that I feel like there is significant doubt as to what someone is looking for when they search "Santiago Bernabéu". If you google "Santiago Bernabéu", the person shows up as the second result (as the Wikipedia article Santiago Bernabéu Yeste) and not again for at least ten more pages (i.e. 99 of the top 100 results are on the stadium). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:34, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
• Neutral. Close call; could be a candidate for the type of traffic experiment where the disambiguation page links to the topics with redirects, like Santiago Bernabéu (stadium) and Santiago Bernabéu (footballer) for a period, then check their hits to see which if any the readership is primarily seeking. -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:15, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

  I can get on with JHunterJ's proposal. Close the RM now without prejudice and run the experiment for a month, then this can be re-proposed if most people are indeed looking for the person. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Need for testing

Discussion transferred from my user page... @King of Hearts, JHunterJ, Ortizesp, GiantSnowman, KingSkyLord, and Amakuru: Paine Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there  09:09, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

---

I don't see a consensus to move here. Since the comments by me and JHunterJ, there have been no further !votes or responses by the supporters. Why not run the proposed experiment to collect some hard data on primary usage? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi King of Hearts, and thank you for coming to my talk page! In that RM, I saw 3 support rationales (including the nom's) based on the COMMONNAME policy and only one oppose rationale (yours). Your argument was sound but not policy-based. So the hatnote I just placed near the top of the Santiago Bernabéu article should suffice. It seemed to me like a clear consensus to rename. Just to be careful, I ran the page views analysis to find that the stadium‍:‍person ratio was presently between 3:1 and 4:1. So it seems pretty clear that the consensus in the discussion was correct to want the pages renamed. Would you have preferred the stadium article to ultimately be renamed to "Santiago Bernabéu" instead? (I thought the name of that stadium included the proper noun "Stadium" as in "Estadio Santiago Bernabéu". Isn't that correct?) Paine Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there  08:13, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I concur with King of ♥. The argument that the person is primary over the much more well-known stadium was not well presented, and there's no consensus for that outcome. Reverting the move and running the "experiment" suggested by JHunterJ seems like the best way forward. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 08:37, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi Amakuru, and here I thought the page views and the local consensus covered it. There is no primary topic per the page views, and the base name belongs to the person as their COMMONNAME. I see no harm in creating the redirects and running the experiment. If the stadium turns out to be the PTOPIC, then we can revisit the RM. No need to revert the page moves at this time, in my humble opinion. Paine Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there  08:49, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

@Paine Ellsworth: I don't understand your point here - the page views show the stadium with a massive lead over the person, and certainly "more than all the other topics combined", which is the usual benchmark for a primary topic per page views. So if anything, the primary topic is the stadium, but it certainly isn't the person. And JHunterJ's experiment can't be run with the person at the primary, as it relies on having a disambiguation page at the base location, then having each of the two topics linked from that disambiguation page by a different unambiguous link, whose page views we can examine. Once again, I suggest you please revert and go ahead with that idea, then we can reassess the whole situation one month from now, without any prejudice. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 10:16, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

To editor Amakuru: not sure where we're going astray; however, it seems to be the PTOPIC issue. What I have not been able to fathom is how we can consider the stadium to be the primary topic for the base name, Santiago Bernabéu, when the stadium's common name includes the proper noun "Stadium". It's common name is the Santiago Bernabéu Stadium, not just simply "Santiago Bernabéu". So it's a partial title match and PTOPIC does not even enter in. What does enter in is that the person's common name as shown in the above RM discussion is "Santiago Bernabéu". There were three editors who supported the article titling policy, and one opposer whose rationale was neither policy- nor guideline-based. The opposer did later support the dab guideline, PTOPIC; however, that was shown to be a moot point by the policy-based nomination and support consensus.

I will have to defer to the other editors who were involved in the RM, whom I've pinged to this discussion. If they agree with you and KoH that the pages should be moved back, then we'll make it so. Paine Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there  11:34, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

The fact of the matter is, the stadium is frequently referred to as "Santiago Bernabéu" alone. It is why Washington does not have an article on the state even though Washington, D.C. and George Washington are only partial matches. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:38, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Then reliable sources can be found that refer to the stadium by the base name, "Santiago Bernabéu", alone? Paine Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there  12:43, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

[1][2][3][4] to name just a few  — Amakuru (talk) 12:48, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Ah, I think I see the issue then. Your comment "So it's a partial title match and PTOPIC does not even enter in" is not correct. Per WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT, you'll see that "The fact that an article has a different title is not a factor in determining whether a topic is primary". The point is that for the specific term "Santiago Bernabéu", the stadium is overwhelmingly the most commonly referred-to subject. Just Google it and you'll see what I mean. The fact that the stadium has a different title is not relevant in making that determination. So yes, the common name of the person is Santiago Bernabéu too, but he cannot be put at that title as it's ambiguous. If you're not able to revert the move or relist the discussion, then it'll have to go to move review, which would be a shame because simply effecting the suggestion of JHunterJ seems an easier and more straightforward route for us to take. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 12:46, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Makes sense, and I think all is as it was now. Done. Paine Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there  15:57, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

@Paine Ellsworth: I have implemented the experiment on Santiago Bernabéu. Could you reclose the discussion above (e.g. with a result like "on hold")? I don't think it's productive to have an RM open for !voting while data is being collected. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:07, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

To editor King of Hearts: the request has been temporarily closed pending the outcome of the experiment. The discussion will remain on the WP:RM page until final closure. Paine Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there  03:01, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Test results discussion

<Last day of test: 7 August 2019 – Please post results in this section.>

To editor King of Hearts: gentle reminder that we would like to know what you've found. Paine Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there  04:05, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Per current results, it looks like the stadium has 121 views compared to the footballer at 97. Therefore I think we can safely conclude that those searching for Santiago Bernabéu are not predominantly looking for the footballer, and so it should be disambiguated. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:38, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your work on this!

To editors JHunterJ, Ortizesp, GiantSnowman, KingSkyLord and Amakuru: it would appear that the present titles remain appropriate for the Santiago Bernabéu Yeste article and the Santiago Bernabéu disambiguation page. The footballer's article title has the natural disambiguation of his maternal family name "Yeste", and the dab page seems correctly titled with the base name. Do you each concur? Paine Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there  10:39, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

No. Page views like this don't mean anything, really. GiantSnowman 10:54, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Yes, certainly I concur. If anything, the stadium is still primary topic, but page views are close and the footballer has significance too, so a dab page is best all around. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 14:01, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Yes, I concur with the base name disambiguation, and I'll take your word for it on the appropriate natural disambiguation for the footballer. Page view like this mean something, really. -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:33, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

At this point, I don't see consensus to move or not move, so this request is relisted one more time. Paine Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there  03:32, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

• No WP:PTOPIC.

(1) (i) Another English-language source which calls the stadium simply 'Santiago Bernabéu'. It is particularly significant because it is Real Madrid's official site. (ii) An English-language source which calls the player 'Santiago Bernabeu'. Spanish matronymics, like English middle names, are useful disambiguators, but are rarely used outside the most formal of contexts.

(2) The redirects Santiago Bernabéu (stadium) and Santiago Bernabéu (footballer) got 93 (58%) and 67 (42%) views respectively over the last 30 days. They don't show up on typing 'Santiago Bernabéu' into the search box; only the DAB page, the stadium, the player and the metro do. They are overwhelmed by the views of the articles themselves: 20,450 and 4,576 respectively.

(3) The pageviews over the last year (up to 20 June, to eliminate the effect of this RM) were 80% for the stadium and 18% for the player (2% for the metro; DAB page omitted from the calculation). That is a large difference, but IMO not enough to change the status quo. PTOPICs invariably collect bad links-in which are very difficult to find and fix, and which degrade the encyclopaedia.

(4) Traffic through the DAB page is minimal: 0.7% of the total views in the last year of the four pages which show up in the search box. The overwhelming majority of readers are getting to where they want from the search box. Declaring a PTOPIC might mess up that satisfactory situation.

(5) Another argument I find attractive is this: if something is named after someone, then it is very likely that either the person is PTOPIC or there is no PTOPIC. See e.g. Talk:Jethro Tull (band)#Requested move 15 January 2018. Narky Blert (talk) 17:31, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

• Oppose per NATURAL and PRECISION Red Slash 23:09, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
• Support the move, I still think the person the Stadium is named after is primary topic. Case in point, Wembley Stadium isn't primary topic for Wembley despite having more pageviews and going by the shortened name. Moreover, Santiago Bernabeu the person didn't go by his second last name so I don't think it's a good disambiguator and would prefer adding (footballer) at the end of his page title instead.--Ortizesp (talk) 17:27, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
• No PTOPIC per Narky Blert and my reasoning above. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:21, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 1 November 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:42, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

---

Santiago Bernabéu Yeste → Santiago Bernabéu (footballer) – WP:COMMONNAME is always just Santiago Bernabéu. His second last name Yeste is not generally used, and most references, eternal links, and wiki links can attest to that. Additionally, Yeste as differentiator is arbitrary since technically it's "de Yeste". Having the parenthesis (footballer) more cleary DABs the page, and follows general naming conventions for footballers. Everything named after him omits his second last name.Ortizesp (talk) 15:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 13:55, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

• Support and keep the disambig page Santiago Bernabéu where it is. GiantSnowman 13:57, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.