Talk:Schienenzeppelin

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Rail transport in Germany task force (assessed as High-importance).

This article lacks references.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It's the Same Thing

Latest comment: 17 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

The two articles should be merged. I suggest the name 'rail blimp', which conveys the same idea but is more descriptive for the English-speaking world. A cross reference to the Bennie Railplane would also be in order. Gordon Vigurs 13:48, 29 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Agree to merge. No to the title 'rail blimp', if only because the Zeppelin was not a blimp (not to mention that it's not Wikipedia's function to coin new words).Lars T. 18:44, 11 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Agree and should merge to the German name. Mangoe 12:19, 6 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Agree should merge to the German name.Oxyman 04:29, 27 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Having originally been proposed on 29 May 2006 and with no objections expressed I took the liberty of merging the two articles Oxyman 19:04, 27 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

It looks a pretty good job. Thanks. Gordon Vigurs 01:10, 28 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic