Talk:Scotia Place
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 22 July 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Scotia Place (Calgary) to Scotia Place. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Flood Plain
editI don't understand all the comments in the media about the 2013 flood. The West Village didn't flood in 2013. All the flooding took place further east.96.51.16.28 (talk) 22:23, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- It's because everyone is hyper sensitive to flooding right now, and one expert took advantage of that by decrying the risk if we should have an event worse than a "once in five hundred years" flood. Or, in short, because the media knows it will get people reading their stories. Resolute 14:20, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Billionaire status not hearsay, citations below
editHi User:Rford77 (User Talk:Rford77) regarding your revision of CalgaryNEXT on 30 January 2016 where you removed (Eliminated "billionaires" from text as respective financial position is hearsay.)
There are sources for their billionaire status in these articles on the page and they have been added to the lede. Thanks for drawing attention to that.Oceanflynn (talk) 16:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Journalist Jason Markusoff's article includes a photo of Edwards, Riddell and Markin with sources listed reliable sources for his billionaire and almost-billionaire claims: Forbes and Alberta Venture Magazine so I have reverted that change.
- Markusoff, Jason (4 December 2014). "Arena debate: Why it matters that the Flames owners are billionaires, and why it doesn't". Calgary Herald. Retrieved 13 January 2016. http://calgaryherald.com/sports/hockey/nhl/calgary-flames/the-arena-the-billionaire-factor
- Lambert, Taylor (19 August 2015). "New Calgary arena proposal nothing short of brazen". Calgary Herald. Retrieved 13 January 2016. http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/taylor-lambert-new-calgary-arena-proposal-nothing-short-of-brazen
Requested move 22 July 2024
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 12:02, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Scotia Place (Calgary) → Scotia Place – As the current name of a major sporting arena in one of North America's "Big Four" someone searching for Scotia Place is much more likely to be looking for this arena, rather than a lightly notable office building in which Scotiabank was previously a tenant IceBergYYC (talk) 20:13, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom schetm (talk) 20:24, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Calerusnak (talk) 14:27, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support or at least DAB. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:29, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support 45BearsFan (talk) 19:32, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 16:34, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Hatnote
editThe hatnote is meant to address ambiguity. "Rice Howard Place" and "Canadian Tire Centre" are not ambiguous with "Scotia Place". Scotia Place (Edmonton) and Scotiabank Place, however, are ambiguous; the hatnote should include these two wikilinks. 162 etc. (talk) 16:45, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- there should probably be an invisible comment there then ShallowC (talk) 01:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- I did it, I tried my best to follow 162 etc.'s edit summary, it might not be the best but hey it's invisible and doesnt have any affect to the reader. 45BearsFan (talk) 01:22, 5 August 2024 (UTC)