Talk:Second United States Army

Lead-in

I noticed that the lead-in is running a little long and I'm willing to spend some time doing some re-arraging to make it more concise. Other thoughts? Rbcwa (talk) 02:05, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

It's fine by by me. I am having trouble with the 'single point of contact' myself. I know there are citations for the permanent changes of station to Ft Gordon. --Ancheta Wis   (talk | contribs) 06:35, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

OK, made an attempt. It still seems too long. I'll try to do a little more later. Rbcwa (talk) 04:15, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

I did some more work on the lead-in. Let me know if I'm being too terse. This history is important, but I'd like to keep the intro more accessible. Rbcwa (talk) 03:05, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Keeping ARCYBER and 2nd Army Separate

Someone will eventually ask if the ARCYBER and 2nd Army Article should be merged. My gut instinct is that they should stay separate. ARCYBER as a name, may fade into something else in the future, but 2nd Army has already been resurrected a few times. Should the articles be kept separate? Rbcwa (talk) 03:35, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Commanders

Does anyone know of a place with a list of the commanders of the 2nd from 83-95?--Vidkun (talk)14:51, 29 January 2011 (UTC)