Talk:Seeds of Change
(Redirected from Talk:Seeds of Change (disambiguation))
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Extraordinary Writ in topic Requested move 12 September 2022
 | Disambiguation | |||
| ||||
 | On 12 September 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Seeds of Change (disambiguation) to Seeds of Change. The result of the discussion was moved. |
"Seeds of Change" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Seeds of Change and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 11#Seeds of Change until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Paradoctor (talk) 22:02, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Requested move 12 September 2022
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:24, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Seeds of Change (disambiguation) → Seeds of Change – No clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, per pageviews. Paradoctor (talk) 18:08, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The existing primary topic was moved to Seeds of Change (company) by OP prior to this requested move. 162 etc. (talk) 18:42, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- The whole point of this request is that the company is not the primary topic, that there is, in fact, no such topic. Paradoctor (talk) 21:03, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- The usual procedure is to take that existing primary topic into consideration by proposing a multi-page move (WP:RMPM) - in this case, it would have been both the company page and the dab page. -- Netoholic @ 04:04, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Is there any doubt about what to do here? Paradoctor (talk) 06:28, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Is there any reason to rush? I suggest reading the guidance at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Controversial - page move discussions avoid a lot of problems, and its more often than not worth it to take the time to do things right. We're trying to avoid a scenario where editors may hold strong opinions about what topic among several (if any) is the best primary topic, and then engage in page-move wars. -- Netoholic @ 07:09, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Pageviews. There's prudence, and then there's paranoia. Paradoctor (talk) 17:16, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Is there any reason to rush? I suggest reading the guidance at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Controversial - page move discussions avoid a lot of problems, and its more often than not worth it to take the time to do things right. We're trying to avoid a scenario where editors may hold strong opinions about what topic among several (if any) is the best primary topic, and then engage in page-move wars. -- Netoholic @ 07:09, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Is there any doubt about what to do here? Paradoctor (talk) 06:28, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- The usual procedure is to take that existing primary topic into consideration by proposing a multi-page move (WP:RMPM) - in this case, it would have been both the company page and the dab page. -- Netoholic @ 04:04, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- The whole point of this request is that the company is not the primary topic, that there is, in fact, no such topic. Paradoctor (talk) 21:03, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support this is already being discussed at RFD so we don't really need to discuss it here as well. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:31, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Crouch, Swale: I just closed that RfD as withdrawn. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:57, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support as above In ictu oculi (talk) 10:18, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support. The current situation is WP:MALPLACED. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:57, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support as above MrKeefeJohn (talk) 10:15, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.