Talk:Xi'an–Shiyan high-speed railway

(Redirected from Talk:Shiyan–Xi'an high-speed railway)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Silikonz in topic Requested move 7 February 2023

Requested move 7 February 2023

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved(closed by non-admin page mover) (to Xi'an–Shiyan high-speed railway) Silikonz💬 15:16, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply



Shiyan–Xi'an high-speed railwayXi'an-Shiyan high-speed railway – Most sources seem to refer to it as Xi'an-Shiyan, but the article was created as part of WikiProject Trains, I presume by knowledgable individuals. Moreover, I don't know Chinese. Someone changed it and it seems like he might be right. According to google translate of the references, it is Xi'an-Shiyan. Bar Harel (talk) 01:02, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Garuda3 as the original author, what do you think? Bar Harel (talk) 01:04, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Support Xi'an–Shiyan high-speed railway The Chinese sources publishes the railway name as 西十高铁. The 西十 characters in 西十高铁 takes after cities' names, i.e. 西安 (Xi'an) 堰 (Shiyan). 高铁 is high-speed railway. In English sources (that are not used here: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]) refers to the railway as Xi'an–Shiyan high-speed railway. However, do note that many of these sources reflect the official translation by the Chinese government by virtue of being official news/websites of the government. Nonetheless, in absence a common English name, this is what we can fall back on.
Additionally, endash between Xi'an and Shiyan should be used, instead of just dash/hyphen according to MOS:ENDASH. If moved, the dash version should be created as a redirect to the endash version to aid in on-site search and linking. – robertsky (talk) 03:31, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.