Talk:Sijekovac killings
This article was nominated for deletion on 29 April 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Sijekovac killings be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in Bosnia and Herzegovina may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled
editIf western media don't cover an event, it doesn't mean it never happened... --TheFEARgod (Ч) 21:27, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
There were so many places where war crimes were conducted against muslim population, for western media to cover, so why should journalists need to write about serbian media's falsified reports? Of course, I am sympathetic with those innocent serbians who suffered during the Bosnian war, but suffering of the muslim population was in incomparable dimensions. The Bosnian war showed the real face of all balkan orthodox christian nations (serbians, bulgarians, greeks) and was a clear evidence of their behaviour. They all like to blame muslims and turks for various genocides throughout history, but in fact they are hte real perpetrators of mass murder and ethnic cleansing of civilian muslim population in these lands with the help of their barbarian friends- the Russians who recentley showed their skills of man killing in Chechnya.--Leventcik (talk) 21:50, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Forensic identification since 2004?
editHas anything been heard of these 59 exhumed bodies since 2004? It's been six years now... --Joy [shallot] (talk) 11:22, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Sijekovac killings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721102750/http://www.slobodnadalmacija.hr/Spektar/tabid/94/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/104161/Default.aspx to http://www.slobodnadalmacija.hr/Spektar/tabid/94/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/104161/Default.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100602071419/http://www.novilist.hr/2010/05/31/josipovic-odao-pocast-ubijenim-s.aspx to http://www.novilist.hr/2010/05/31/josipovic-odao-pocast-ubijenim-s.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:09, 21 September 2017 (UTC)