Talk:Sinhala script

(Redirected from Talk:Sinhala alphabet)
Latest comment: 9 months ago by Duckmather in topic "ඞ" listed at Redirects for discussion
Former good articleSinhala script was one of the Language and literature good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 10, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
August 25, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
October 26, 2008Good article nomineeListed
June 26, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

"ඞ" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect . The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 6#ඞ until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 21:46, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Section Letters > Miśra set doesn't show aspiration in the Consonants table

edit

The table transcribes ඛ, ඝ, ඡ, ඣ, ඨ, ඪ, ථ, ධ, ඵ, භ with k, g, t͡ʃ~t͡ɕ, d͡ʒ~d͡ʑ, ʈ, ɖ, t, d, p, b, respectively, instead of kʰ ɡʱ t͡ʃʰ~t͡ɕʰ(~cʰ), d͡ʒʱ~d͡ʑʱ(~ɟʱ), ʈʰ, ɖʱ, tʰ, dʱ, pʰ, bʱ. Is this the intention, presumably to transcribe the Sinhalese pronunciation of those letters, or should it be changed to respresent the intended, Sanskrit/Pali pronunciations of the letters? Masimatutu (talk) 12:38, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Close to quickfail level. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:14, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA from 2008. there's Significant unsourced material in the article. Also, the article looks like it needs a clean up or at least a major CE. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:35, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 8 § ඞ until a consensus is reached. Duckmather (talk) 23:14, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply