Talk:Smok wawelski
(Redirected from Talk:Smok (archosaur))
Latest comment: 5 years ago by FunkMonk in topic Should this be at Smok wawelski?
 | A fact from Smok wawelski appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 August 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Should this be at Smok wawelski?
editI think there was some talks about disambiguation parenthesis not being needed for monotypic taxa? Maybe IJReid said this? FunkMonk (talk) 13:43, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
- Oh, looking again, seems Smok wawelski is occupied by the dragon. But should it be? That article is now at the English name. Confusing situation... FunkMonk (talk) 13:44, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
- There was a discussion where we revised the standard and put "Genus species" as priority to anything "Genus (some bracketed word)". But if Smok wawelski is already taken, by an article that is currently at its proper name, we simply leave this. I'm not sure why Smok wawelski has an article, unless theres a disambiguation it should probably be at Smok since its the thing every other Smok name is taken from. IJReid {{T - C - D - R}} 15:27, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
- I started a discussion about such issues here:[1] FunkMonk (talk) 02:54, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- There was a discussion where we revised the standard and put "Genus species" as priority to anything "Genus (some bracketed word)". But if Smok wawelski is already taken, by an article that is currently at its proper name, we simply leave this. I'm not sure why Smok wawelski has an article, unless theres a disambiguation it should probably be at Smok since its the thing every other Smok name is taken from. IJReid {{T - C - D - R}} 15:27, 18 May 2019 (UTC)