Talk:Snooze (SZA song)/GA1

Latest comment: 22 days ago by Arconning in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: PSA (talk · contribs) 00:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 14:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Will review this in a few days :)) Arconning (talk) 14:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Prose and MoS

edit

Lead and infobox

edit
  • The main vocals are complemented by several layers of harmonies beneath, and a riff appears on the song's beginning., I'd suggest changing "on" to "in" or "at".
  • Love the lead btw! Amazing writing. :)

Background

edit
  • No issues here on prose and MoS.

Composition

edit
  • No issues here, song is dreamy indeed.

Production

edit
  • Upon finishing the demo, BLK sent his work to Leon Thomas III, who, along with Khris Riddick-Tynes, compose the production duo the Rascals., I think it's a me problem but is "compose" in this sentence referring to the band or the song? If either answer would be given, would it be better to put composed?

Lyrics

edit
  • No issues.

Release

edit
  • No issues.

Critical reception

edit
  • No issues!

Commercial performance

edit
  • as a non-single track,, omit the comma.

Music video

edit
  • Well, that was a read.
  • to nothing but a G-string underwear, omit "a" and wikilink "G-string underwear" if there's an applicable page.

Live performances and covers

edit

Accolades, credits, charts, certifications, and release history

edit
  • Tables are formatted well with proper sourcing.

Refs

edit
  • Earwig just picks up lyrics, other possible violations are the same, so it's fine.
  • Random spotchecks: 1, 11, 25, 26, 35, 36, 46, 53, 75, 84, 118. All good
  • Fix citation 102 for the article about John Legend, seems not formatted properly.

Media

edit
  • Images and audio file have proper licensing and are relevant to the article.

Misc

edit
  • No ongoing edit war, broad and focused information, neutral as I see no bias whatsoever.

PSA, amazing writing btw! Here are my short comments. Arconning (talk) 14:23, 7 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your review and kind words, @Arconning. All your suggestions have been implemented. Elias / PSA 🏕️🪐 [please make some noise] Elias / PSA 🏕️🪐 [please make some noise] 23:10, 7 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.