Talk:Solar shingle
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Solar shingle article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 November 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tcarter21.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:46, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Initial comments
editGood subject for current and future roofing. Nice discussion for a new product on the market. I would like to see other references. Are there magazines or articles published in hard copy? UrbanRez 05:35, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Photo
editCan someone import this image from http://www1.eere.energy.gov/solar/photovoltaics.html ? There is another one somewhere on the site showing a carpenter using a hammer, but carpenters use nail guns more than hammers, like in the above photo. 199.125.109.124 (talk) 04:54, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Elk Premium Building Products
editIt might be useful to include info in the history section related to the effort by ATS, Spheral Solar Power and Elk Premium Building Products To Develop New Generation Photovaltaic Roofing Products as described in an article here, as this effort precedes the effort by Dow by many years. Also it might be useful to mention the patent 7587864 by Elk for what appears to be an even more advanced PV roof shingle link. --Rbarline (talk) 21:48, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Removed ELs
editI'm not disagreeing with this removal (on 16 December), but I want to post the removed links here because at least two seem useful in improving the article:
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved to Solar shingle, per WP:SINGULAR Mike Cline (talk) 14:22, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Solar shingles → Solar shingle – Titles should be singular except in rare cases. For example, Roof shingle, Asphalt shingle, Wood shingle, Shake (shingle), and article titles for many other repeating architectural elements(e.g. Clapboard, Tile) are singular in compliance with the MOS. Jojalozzo 05:33, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Survey
edit- Support. As I understand it, "solar shingles" is a particularly painful form of herpes zoster. Kauffner (talk) 08:20, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose. Solar shingles is a power system. It makes no sense to say one solar shingle. You can not even put up one solar shingle, as they are in a strip. Apteva (talk) 16:48, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
- Support – The singular form is used in places in the article and its sources, and makes perfect sense, so we should use it. It's unclear why Apteva claims that "It makes no sense to say one solar shingle". Dicklyon (talk) 03:39, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- It should be perfectly clear. If you look at a photo of the strips of solar shingles you can see that each one has maybe 7 or more shingle sections. You can not cut these apart like you can an asphalt shingle. You have to use them as a whole strip of shingles. Some of them even come in a roll, but are not terribly long. It just does not make any sense to title the article Solar shingle, and start it out, Solar shingles, also called photovoltaic shingles, are solar cells designed to look like conventional asphalt shingles. It is impossible to make the title bold. Apteva (talk) 07:21, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Discussion
edit- Any additional comments:
- I do not think this article is about a "power system" any more than Solar panel is about a power system. Jojalozzo 05:50, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
- It's not true that all solar shingles come in strips. Some solar shingles use a true single shingle format (http://assets.inhabitat.com/images/bipvsunslate_copy.jpg). Jojalozzo 05:50, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
- That is the exception and is more like a solar slate than a shingle. Apteva (talk) 23:20, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
- No, it is not an exception. The Dow Powerhouse shingles are 10" high and 22" wide. These are closer to a shingle than the long strips that make no attempt to look like shingles and are more like very wide tiles than shingles. Is it your argument that because the long strips are not much like shingles, we must use the plural "shingles" instead of the singular "shingle"? This request seems like a no-brainer, simply complying with the MOS for titles. Jojalozzo 06:09, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
- A search of google books shows that solar shingles is used four times as often as solar shingle. An example shows that shingles would have been a better choice: "The solar shingle is installed directly". One shingle? Who installs only one? Apteva (talk) 19:37, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- No, it is not an exception. The Dow Powerhouse shingles are 10" high and 22" wide. These are closer to a shingle than the long strips that make no attempt to look like shingles and are more like very wide tiles than shingles. Is it your argument that because the long strips are not much like shingles, we must use the plural "shingles" instead of the singular "shingle"? This request seems like a no-brainer, simply complying with the MOS for titles. Jojalozzo 06:09, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
- That is the exception and is more like a solar slate than a shingle. Apteva (talk) 23:20, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Dow no longer in the Solar Shingle business
editPOWERHOUSE™ Shingles No Longer Available Dow announced on June 28, 2016, that it will cease manufacturing POWERHOUSE™ modules. As part of the transition to cease POWERHOUSE™ operations, we will no longer be providing design services for new projects.
Dow will continue to support warranties issued on existing POWERHOUSE™ Systems.
If you have questions regarding your warranty, please contact Dow at 1-855-DOW-SOLR (Option 3) or solarservices@dow.com.Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).