Talk:South (band)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa (talk) 19:29, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

---

South (British band) → South (band) – This article was originally created at South (band) but moved in 2006 by an ediotor claiming there was an American band called South, however no such article has ever been created in seven years. I see no reason for this article name to be so specific. --Relisted. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:34, 4 March 2014 (UTC) --Tbone556 (talk) 23:01, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

• Oppose the disambiguation page South (disambiguation) clearly lists a band called "The South", which we have an article which covers it. -- 70.50.151.11 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:03, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

That's a band called The South, not South. A completely irrelevant point. Thanks for your input. Tbone556 (talk) 00:13, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

"The" is kept or dropped at whim, therefore anything missing "The" is automatically ambiguous with anything that has "The". -- 70.50.151.11 (talk) 04:15, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

• Oppose - I don't know whether the 2006 editor was refering to The South, to Lonnie Mack's South or Fred Burch's South but can't see any urgency to remove "British" from the title of this article. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:09, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
• Comment There was an article for an American band until late 2012. That group released an album on Jagjaguwar Records and might arguably be notable, although noise from other bands, including this one, makes Googling album reviews hard. Just so it's clear that the claim of no article for an American band is in error... Chubbles (talk) 19:06, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
• "South (British band)" could also refer to The South - would a hatnote template be enough? Peter James (talk) 20:20, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
• Comment. A definite article can be applied to any band, including, so the presence or lack of it does not disambiguate. However, both the bands are British. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:59, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
• Support. "British" adds nothing, and merely confuses the issue since the other band is also British (it is actually discussed at the title The Beautiful South). Use hat notes to get readers where they want to go.--Cúchullain ^t/c 16:12, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
• Support. Seven years is enough time to wait for articles with other meanings to surface. It's now obvious that the British band is the primary topic. JIP | Talk 06:10, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on South (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070702170555/http://www.vinylnet.co.uk/record-label-discographies.asp to http://www.vinylnet.co.uk/record-label-discographies.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:42, 26 December 2017 (UTC)