Talk:Star Trek: Enterprise season 2

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Star Trek: Enterprise (season 2)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 22:16, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Enterprise is the only series I haven't watched but I'll be happy to review this JAGUAR  22:16, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Initial comments

• The lead summarises the article well and I couldn't find any prose issues with it, although I would have questioned the sentence regarding introducing the Romulans into the Star Trek franchise as it sounds like it was their actual first appearence...

• I've switched around that sentence to make it clearer that it was the first appearance in the timeline rather than just their first appearance. Miyagawa (talk) 17:52, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

• Can a little more be added to the Plot overview section? Did anything significant happen in this season or did it not have a single story-arc?

• There was no single story arc for the season, they were literally all bottle shows with the exception of the damage caused in "Minefield" leading into the following episode. Even the Temporal Cold War wasn't really touched upon much. Miyagawa (talk) 17:52, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

• LeVar Burton is linked twice in the Episodes section

• Fixed. Miyagawa (talk) 17:52, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

• "Production on the second season of Enterprise began on June 24, 2004" - but it aired between 2002-2003?

• Thanks, that should have been 2002, not 2004. Miyagawa (talk) 17:52, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

• LeVar Burton playing Geordi LaForge is not mentioned in the Production section whereas Roxanne Dawson is?

• That is a fair point. Put that thought on hold and I'll find a source and add it. Miyagawa (talk) 17:52, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

• "The season opened with Nielsen rating]s" - typo

• Fixed. Miyagawa (talk) 17:52, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

• "But the series didn't win any of the awards it was nominated for" - sounds a bit informal, might sound better as However, the series did not win any of the awards it was nominated for

• Thanks, I've replaced with your suggested wording. Miyagawa (talk) 17:52, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

References

• No dead links

On hold

This is overall a very well written article that almost meets the GA criteria. All of the points I mentioned above were minor and shouldn't take too long to clarify, so this should be good to go once they're addressed. Thanks! JAGUAR  15:27, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, I just need to add some LeVar Burton stuff - once I have I'll add a further comment here to say it has been done. Miyagawa (talk) 17:52, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Ok, I've added Burton - I also swapped out the image of Patrick Stewart for an actual on set photo that we can use courtesy of NASA. Miyagawa (talk) 18:08, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Close - promoted

Sounds like half of The Next Generation if this season were all bottle shows! I thought about watching Enterprise but I don't think anything can beat the epic-ness of the Dominion War... anyway this article is looking good, the prose is well written and now those minor details have been added it now passes the comprehensiveness part of the criteria. Well done JAGUAR  21:35, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Star Trek: Enterprise (season 2). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140218141955/http://www.startrek.com/article/enterprise-season-two-blu-ray-available-august-20 to http://www.startrek.com/article/enterprise-season-two-blu-ray-available-august-20

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:50, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Star Trek: Enterprise (season 2). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160215235448/http://www.tvtango.com/series/star_trek_enterprise/episodes/sort/episodeNumber/type/asc to http://www.tvtango.com/series/star_trek_enterprise/episodes/sort/episodeNumber/type/asc

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:55, 19 June 2017 (UTC)