Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 18 March 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Keelinjohn. Peer reviewers: Keelinjohn.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Members

edit

As the charter of IRENA is not in force yet, from the legal point of view there are no members, but only signatory states. The charter will become in force after 25th states deposits its ratification instrument. All countries signed for this date would be considered as founding members. Therefore, there is no need to count the members right now and mentioning 75 countries signed on the founding conference would be enough. The number of members would be relevant after the carter is coming into force. Therefore, I will remove the information about the 76th member right now. It is also worth for mentioning that the 76th signator was Belarus and not India. The given reference says nothing about India. India has decided to join,; however, there is no information about signing by India yet. Beagel (talk) 17:13, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

outdated article

edit

We're past peak oil , and IRENA is expanding really fast .. please update the article ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.201.223.13 (talk) 21:05, 15 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Thats not the first article about IRENA btw., I added the interwikis. Its as well sort of overstretch to assign the glamour to Hermann Scheer only. First reneweables initiative are as old as the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment and the Brandt Report, they even have played a role in the plans to provide a third (enviromental) pillar to NATO in the 60ties. I changed the entry insofar. Serten (talk) 12:48, 6 August 2014 (UTC) PS.: I think its quite problematic to base wide parts of the article on Scheers papers, since those are quite one-sided. E.g. in Austria, Norbert Hofer, leading member from right wing Freedom Party of Austria was head of Eurosolar - will say, Scheer was not the only one to suggest Vranitzkys initiiative and it was not only the greens ;). Serten (talk) 12:58, 6 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on International Renewable Energy Agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:58, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply


Critique

edit

A. This article has a few areas where citations are needed based on facts stated with no reliable citation link. I've added [citation needed] to various areas where I think a citation can be used. Specifically, toward the end of the 1st section in the 4th and 7th paragraphs.

C. This article is probably a little biased as it's an environmentally focused wiki page, however, the page seems single-minded in its effort to promote IRENA. It may be helpful to have a section on reasons why some countries choose to not be a part of IRENA or what their viewpoints may be.

D. A lot of the information comes from IRENA directly so that gives a lot of potential for bias and the bias is noticed in the ressoundning praise for IRENA.

F. Citations - I checked on the citation links and found that many lead to error pages and are not viable. Specifically #4,14,15, and 18. #18 actually leads to an archived page about Cialis, so not relevant to the topic.

G. - Much of this inormation seems a few years out of date. There is actually 160 members of IRENA now and a whole list of countries that are in process of accession including 23 states. It would also be helpful to have a list of countries that are a part of IRENA. One can be found at this link - [1] Keelinjohn (talk) 03:54, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

References