Talk:Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010
(Redirected from Talk:Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Antony-22 in topic Merge inverted
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
 | The contents of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 page were merged into Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Result was merge.
merge proposal
editProposal to merge Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 into Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act.
Near as I can tell, the two articles share the same subject. I don't have a strong opinion about which should be the surviving title. --joe deckertalk to me 14:28, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- Merge - identical subject. Going over other examples in Category:United States federal government administration legislation the "if YEAR" format is used mainly (but not only) when two acts have the same name and only differ by year. I therefore also support the proposed direction of merge. --Muhandes (talk) 17:13, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- Merge - Agreed, looks to be the same subject.--Yaksar (let's chat) 19:08, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- Merge - Agreed, best have all the information on one topic in the same article. Stidmatt (talk) 23:52, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Merge inverted
editThe merge above was carried out in the wrong direction. The text has been at Statutory Pay-as-You-Go Act since 2011, but I have moved the text to the correct standard name, Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010. Because there is history at both titles, {{db-move}} is not an option, so this is a rare case where a copy-and-paste move is warranted. Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 04:06, 21 December 2017 (UTC)