Talk:Still Breathing (Green Day song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MarioSoulTruthFan (talk · contribs) 21:43, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Infobox

• "January 15 – July 24, 2016" → source plus add to the article.
• "Pop punk alternative rock" → should be in the body of the article

Lead

• Very small lead.
• who wrote and produced the song, release dates, add more detail regarding the official video (resume of plot, director of the video and so on), some background of the song.
• Needs serious work this section.

Background and composition

• "Armstrong wrote became "Bang Bang"," → Armstrong wrote was "Bang Bang",
• "than "Bang Bang"" → than the lead single
• Use {{spaced ndash}}

Release

• was released as the second single from Revolution Radio on November 12, 2016 → where?
• The source says "Still Breathing" debuts on the Nov. 12 Mainstream Rock Songs" → release and debut are two very different things.
• Discogs is not a reliable source. But I get that you intended the back cover use "CiteAV Media" to quote that stuff or use a side note.
• Remove the Billie Joe Armstrong picture, its not from the video or anything like that.

Music video

• This shouldn't be under the release section.
• and feel content → use something else this sounds awful.
• Sources should be in an ascent order. Example: 8, 12, 18

Reception

• If you could add more two or three reviews wouldn't be a bad idea at all.
• Link Music Critics to music journalism.

Chart performance

• "The song also charted in Belgium (Ultratip Flanders), Czech Republic (Rádio Top 100 Oficiální), and Slovakia (Rádio Top 100 Oficiální)." → add the respective peaks.
• Use {{spaced ndash}}.

Track listing

• Missing sources.
• "All lyrics written by Billie Joe Armstrong;" → not according to the infobox

Charts

• Fine

References

• This section is a huge problem in here.
• First. Only link once when it first appears, for example, the first time that appears Rolling Stone you link it.
• Some works are under publisher and the other way around, you can have both, however, GA's can have only work from the sources. Example given: Billboard
• Missing authors in several articles.

External links

• Fine

Overall GA review

• Why there isn't a release history section with the process on top of it?
• Missing a personnel section with credits.
• No Live performances?
• This article needs some serious work and after addressing all these issues I will give it another review. It seems a bit rushed from your part. On hold for seven days for the first batch of changes. Good luck, anything ping me. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 21:42, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

@Yash!: are you up for this? MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:45, 10 July 2017 (UTC)