Talk:Sub-Zero (company)

(Redirected from Talk:Sub-Zero (brand))
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Locke Cole in topic Logos


Untitled

edit

There are some people in the industry who think SubZero refrigerators are not quite as good as they are trumped up to be; the article here seems a little bit commercially slanted and biased.

Wow, yeah, this is an incredible advertisement. Personally I think it should be a deleted, and perhaps some NPOV article on the company be put up instead. This is no Wikipedia-class article.

my edit: they are good refrigerators but ppl hate them because you can't open the door for 10 seconds after you close it. That is why so many ppl hate them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.91.29.44 (talk) 18:19, 5 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Agreed reads like an ad — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexcreatorz (talkcontribs) 18:52, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

In Response to the December 2005 Post

edit

The Sub Zero article seemed objective using terms such as "claims to have invented" "professional style" "some people feel" "which is said". If industry statistics are accurate, Sub-Zero's last 17-20 years, other refrigerators about 8-11. The Sub Zero warranty is up to 12 years which actually hurts its rating in Consumer Reports (which is considered very biased in some circles) b/c Sub-Zero customers are more likely to repair their refrigerator rather than replace it b/c the warranty is so long.

Sub-Zero is actually made by Sub-Zero which cannot be said about many brands these days...it's produced in Madison WI and Phoenix AZ. Most Sub Zero owners find that the dual refrigeration system keeps food fresher longer which is a money saver in terms of food spoilage costs. Like most high end luxury brands, there is a reason for the cache attached to that brand.

History of previous edits

edit

I discovered this article by chance back in December (whilst looking for misspellings of "acquire"). It looked to me like a straight "cut-and-paste" from an advertisement. I added phrases like "claims to have invented" and "some people think" for NPOV. But I'm British, and I'm in no position to judge whether the topic deserves a Wikipedia article at all. So if anyone wants to nominate it for deletion, that's fine by me. CarolGray 08:40, 7 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

It should be kept, as there are pages for most of its competitors.

This should be made part of a disambiguation page, as Sub-Zero is also the name of a character in Mortal Kombat.

Distribution

edit

Is it worth adding some notes on distribution? Often the terms vary greatly between countries. In Australia, for example, I know they are exclusive to Appliances Online and Winning Appliances. 125.255.85.74 (talk) 22:35, 6 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nonsense phrase

edit

I think that this should be deleted: "Their dealers are strictly vetted and must closely follow advertising and pricing procedures supplied by the manufacturer in order maintain the ability to distribute their products." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theeurocrat (talkcontribs) 18:41, 26 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Innovations

edit

There is a reference to being the "only company to employ dual-refrigeration technology". But there is no explanation of what "dual-refrigeration technology" is, only what it can ostensibly do.101.98.175.68 (talk) 22:00, 27 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Sub-Zero (brand). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:57, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Logos

edit

I've added logos from a PDF source on their site. I found nicer logos in their brochure, but sadly the images don't like being converted to SVG. If someone wants to take a stab at it, the print-ready logos are available here (archive URL here). Source for the simple logos is on the image description pages (same source for all three). —Locke Coletc 00:29, 15 August 2022 (UTC)Reply